Afrux
21-07-04, 21:53
Lees de volledige manifest (http://www.abin.nu/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1058872637&archive=&start_from=&ucat=8&show_cat=8)
Hou nou eens op met de onzin geruchten over anti islam en anti arabismse. Feiten zijn feiten.
Before 1912, there was a marked opposition between two kinds of political traditions. On the one hand, there were the Amazighe political traditions geared towards the managing of the affairs of the "Jama'a" (local community) whatever the size of this Jama'a may be through dialogue and consultation. On the other, there were the "Makhzenian" political traditions inherited in the entire Islamic world not from the period of Prophet Mohammed (Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him) , nor from of the Wise Caliphs (Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Ali). Rather, they were derived from the Heraclian ruling doctrine of the Omeyyads and the Abbassids' Khusruan one, which run contrary to the sprit of political consultation prescribed by Islam and lie outside even the ante-Islamic traditions of the Arabs. The veracity of this historical truth, of utmost importance, lies in the fact that a great many political systems in the Islamic world and especially in the Arab countries still, to this day, follow the example set by the Omeyyads' Heraclian and the Abbassids' Khusruan modes of governing. This is so owing to (a) their strong leaning towards despotism, arbitrary and oppressive rule, and (b) their bent towards showing haughtiness, ostentation and pomp. They have been continuously supported and encouraged to adopt this mode of conduct by legions of flattering and fortune-seeking obsequious "writers" and panegyric "poets", and legions of adulating parasites, free-loaders and evil courtiers who, in the long run, will only cause prejudice to the ruler who trusts them.
Hou nou eens op met de onzin geruchten over anti islam en anti arabismse. Feiten zijn feiten.
Before 1912, there was a marked opposition between two kinds of political traditions. On the one hand, there were the Amazighe political traditions geared towards the managing of the affairs of the "Jama'a" (local community) whatever the size of this Jama'a may be through dialogue and consultation. On the other, there were the "Makhzenian" political traditions inherited in the entire Islamic world not from the period of Prophet Mohammed (Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him) , nor from of the Wise Caliphs (Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Ali). Rather, they were derived from the Heraclian ruling doctrine of the Omeyyads and the Abbassids' Khusruan one, which run contrary to the sprit of political consultation prescribed by Islam and lie outside even the ante-Islamic traditions of the Arabs. The veracity of this historical truth, of utmost importance, lies in the fact that a great many political systems in the Islamic world and especially in the Arab countries still, to this day, follow the example set by the Omeyyads' Heraclian and the Abbassids' Khusruan modes of governing. This is so owing to (a) their strong leaning towards despotism, arbitrary and oppressive rule, and (b) their bent towards showing haughtiness, ostentation and pomp. They have been continuously supported and encouraged to adopt this mode of conduct by legions of flattering and fortune-seeking obsequious "writers" and panegyric "poets", and legions of adulating parasites, free-loaders and evil courtiers who, in the long run, will only cause prejudice to the ruler who trusts them.