PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Turkije sleept onderscheiden bestseller-schrijfster voor gerecht



Coolassprov MC
20-09-06, 20:50
http://www.guardian.co.uk/turkey/story/0,,1876897,00.html


Novelist to go on trial for insulting Turkey

Nick Birch in Istanbul
Wednesday September 20, 2006
The Guardian


Elif Shafak faces trial for 'belittling Turkishness'.

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Books/Pix/authors/2006/07/07/shafak128.jpg


A prize-winning novelist goes on trial tomorrow accused of belittling Turkishness in the latest and strangest of a string of cases spotlighting the country's stuttering reform process.
Elif Shafak's The Bastard of Istanbul has been at the top of Turkish bestseller lists since its publication in March, winning critical praise for its portrait of the friendship between two girls, an Armenian-American and a Turk.

But its treatment of the mass murder of Ottoman Armenians in 1915 has attracted the attention of Kemal Kerincsiz, the nationalist lawyer behind last December's trial of Orhan Pamuk, Turkey's best-known author.

In Shafak's case, he has surpassed himself, hauling her to court for comments made by characters in her novel. Sitting in his cramped Istanbul office, Mr Kerincsiz does not take long to find one of the offending passages.
"I am the grandchild of genocide survivors who lost all their relatives at the hands of Turkish butchers in 1915," he reads, quoting Dikran Stamboulian, a minor Armenian character. "There's plenty more where this came from," he says.

The prospect of being tried for the figments of her imagination strikes Shafak as grotesque. She has, though, no doubts about the seriousness of her situation. She could face three years in jail.

"My accusers will do everything they can to keep this case going," she says. "It's going to be long and tedious."

Shafak gave birth to her first child on Saturday and is undecided whether to attend the hearing. "I gave birth by caesarean and the doctors don't even want me to go outside," she says. "But I don't see this trial as against me personally. The writer in me says 'go', the mother 'don't'."

Few have forgotten the scenes during Pamuk's trial, when nationalists smashed the novelist's car windscreen and attacked foreign observers. They believe a similar welcome is planned for Shafak. For weeks, a website belonging to Mr Kerincsiz's nationalist group has called for protests over this "newly chosen princess of capitulationist intellectuals".

"I oppose all violence," Mr Kerincsiz says, "but if you call somebody's grandfather a butcher, there is no telling what reactions will be."

Newspaper editor Ismet Berkan, another victim of the lawyer's attentions, said violence could ensue. "Let's hope the police are prepared."

Shafak's supporters called today on the Istanbul prosecutor to start an investigation into Mr Kerincsiz for incitation to violence.

If the language of mutual recrimination is so violent, it is in part because the trial is symbolic of a deep rift over Turkey's soul.

For nationalists such as Mr Kerincsiz, the clash of civilisations is real, and Turkey, a Muslim country, belongs with the east. What the European Union is trying to do, he claims, is "strip away our Muslim and Turkish identity". Those such as Shafak who support a more open Turkey, he adds, are "world citizens, half-Turks".

Meant as a reference to Shafak's European childhood and long-term residence in the United States, Mr Kerincsiz's insult is apposite.

"My ideal is cosmopolitanism, refusing to belong to either side in this polarised world," Shafak says. "Too many people see the world in black and white, us and them. That's wrong. Ambiguity, synthesis: these are the things that compose Turkish society, and that is not something to be ashamed of."

It remains to be seen which side will win the Turkish version of this worldwide debate.

Mr Kerincsiz's claim to represent the voice of the people is not being taken seriously - even the country's ultra-nationalist political party has been put off by the violent antics of his supporters. But nationalism is on the increase in Turkey, bolstered in part by the sense that Brussels is playing with the country over accession.

Formerly at the forefront of the reforms that gained Turkey EU candidate membership last year, the government, too, is infected by the new scepticism.

Pressured by Brussels and Turkish liberals to get rid of the penal code article Shafak is being tried under, government spokesman and justice minister Cemil Cicek responded contemptuously. "Are we going to change laws just because Europe wants us to? Changing laws isn't like changing your tie."

For Umut Ozkirimli, an expert on Turkish nationalism, these are worrying words.

"Turkey's been changing rapidly over the past five years, but it hasn't yet reached the point of no return," he says. "These are critical times."

•Erbil Tusalp, an author and journalist, has been fined 5,000 new lira (£1,800) for allegedly insulting the Turkish prime minister in an article in the pro-Kurdish newspaper Birgun, the state-owned Anatolia news agency reported.

mark61
21-09-06, 17:48
Shafak is vrijgesproken bij gebrek aan bewijs.

Top novelist acquitted in Turkey

Elif Shafak hoped her novel would encourage empathy
A court in Istanbul has acquitted the best-selling Turkish novelist, Elif Shafak, who had been accused of insulting Turkish national identity.
Ms Shafak, 35, had faced charges for comments made by her characters on the mass killings of Armenians in the final years of the Ottoman Empire in 1915.

Turkey rejects Armenia's claim that the killings constituted "genocide".

The EU welcomed the court ruling, but urged Turkey to scrap a law that makes it a crime to insult "Turkishness".

The trial was seen by the EU as a test of freedom of expression in Turkey, which began membership talks with the 25-member bloc last October.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan also welcomed the verdict and signalled that the government would consider amending Article 301 of Turkey's penal code. It envisages up to three years in jail for "denigrating Turkish national identity".

"The ruling party and the opposition can sit down together again to discuss this issue as laws are not eternal," Anatolia news agency quoted Mr Erdogan as saying.

Scuffles

The proceedings lasted just 40 minutes and ended in utter chaos, the BBC's Sarah Rainsford reports.

Turkish nationalists demanded a punishment for Ms Shafak

The judges said they based their decision on lack of evidence to prove that Ms Shafak "denigrated Turkish national identity" in her novel, The Bastard Of Istanbul.

Ms Shafak - who recently gave birth to her first child - was not present at the hearing.

Ms Shafak said by telephone that she was extremely relieved her trial was over.

But she expressed concerns that there would be other similar cases in the future as long as Article 301 "is out there".

The nationalist lawyers who brought the case walked out in anger shortly after the trial opened.

They claimed the court and judges had been unduly influenced by the EU.

If Article 301 will be interpreted in this way nobody can write novels in Turkey anymore, no-one can make movies any more

Elif Shafak

Riot police moved in to stop scuffles between nationalists and leftists outside the courthouse.

'Autonomy of art'

One of the lawyers who filed the complaint against Ms Shafak had claimed that her novel was Armenian propaganda, dripping with hatred for the Turks.

One of the novel's characters speaks of "Turkish butchers" and a "genocide", while others talk about being "slaughtered like sheep".

Ms Shafak was the latest in a long line of writers to face similar charges in Turkey. But this was the first time Article 301 had been used against a work of fiction.

"If Article 301 will be interpreted in this way nobody can write novels in Turkey anymore, no-one can make movies any more," Ms Shafak told the BBC before the trial.

"The words of a character could be used as evidence against the author or the film director. I think it is extremely important to defend the autonomy of art, and of literature," she said.

Juliette
21-09-06, 17:56
Geplaatst door mark61
Shafak is vrijgesproken bij gebrek aan bewijs.



Gaat nog meer gebeuren. De aanklager is dezelfde organisatie die Orhan Panuk aangeklaagd heeft.

Eigenlijk weten ze wel dat ze niet kunnen winnen maar ze willen hun 'doelwitten' blijkbaar zoveel mogelijk intimideren en publiekelijk in een negatief daglicht stellen.

mark61
21-09-06, 18:02
@ koelekont: Kan je niet 'in positief' posten? Die 'negatieven' lezen zo rot

Coolassprov MC
22-09-06, 06:25
Geplaatst door mark61
@ koelekont: Kan je niet 'in positief' posten? Die 'negatieven' lezen zo rot

Ben niet geschoold in het verhelpen van depressies noch het aanstichten ervan; mijn advies neem contact met een psychiater.