Bekijk Volledige Versie : Israel schendde VN-resolutie (1701) bijna 940(!!!) maal!
Coolassprov MC
24-08-07, 19:22
According to the Lebanese Army, Israel has, since the passage of resolution 1701, violated it 939 times (735 by air, 58 by sea, and 146 by land).
http://www.al-akhbar.com/ar/node/44297
http://www.al-akhbar.com/files/images/p06_20070822_pic1.full.jpg
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
According to the Lebanese Army, Israel has, since the passage of resolution 1701, violated it 939 times (735 by air, 58 by sea, and 146 by land).
http://www.al-akhbar.com/ar/node/44297
http://www.al-akhbar.com/files/images/p06_20070822_pic1.full.jpg
even voor de duidelijkheid
The Resolution demands:[1]
* Full cessation of hostilities (OP1)
* Israel to withdraw all of its forces from Lebanon in parallel with Lebanese and UNIFIL soldiers deploying throughout the South (OP2)
* Hezbollah to be disarmed (OP3)
* Full control of Lebanon by the government of Lebanon (OP3)
* No paramilitary forces, including (and implying) Hezbollah, will be south of the Litani River (OP8).
The Resolution at the same time also emphasizes:[1]
* The need to address urgently the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers, that have given rise to the current crisis.
:[1] op1 is van beide kanten niet aangehouden
op2 op een klein stuk waar de vn pasgeleden heeft bepaald dat het libanees en niet syrisch is (dus moet israel het terug geven)
op3 euh hezbollah heeft alleen maar meer wapens en de libanese regering heeft geen flikker te vertellen
op8 idem
de israelische soldaten zijn ook nog niet vrijgelaten (laat staan unconditional)
kortom beide partijen lopen over de resolutie heen dus blijft de originele situatie (de staat van oorlog zoals in 1948 door libanon uitgeroepen ) gewoon bestaan
toch wel grappig dat je alleen op wat israel doet focust
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
According to the Lebanese Army, Israel has, since the passage of resolution 1701, violated it 939 times (735 by air, 58 by sea, and 146 by land).
http://www.al-akhbar.com/ar/node/44297
http://www.al-akhbar.com/files/images/p06_20070822_pic1.full.jpg
Dat is weer een sterk staaltje propaganda! Weet je dat Hezbollah nog steeds niet ontwapend is, sterker nog het krijgt nog elke dag meer wapens. Van de twee ontvoerde soldaten, waarom de oorlog is begonnen, is nog steeds niets gehoord.
Coolassprov MC
25-08-07, 08:57
Geplaatst door observer
toch wel grappig dat je alleen op wat israel doet focust
En dat is jullie hele argument; zij doen het ook, dus mogen we het er niet over hebben.
Coolassprov MC
25-08-07, 09:14
Geplaatst door Slinger
Van de twee ontvoerde soldaten, waarom de oorlog is begonnen, is nog steeds niets gehoord.
Voor die oorlog werd door de smerige Zionisten R1701 aangehaald.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
En dat is jullie hele argument; zij doen het ook, dus mogen we het er niet over hebben. nee wat wij zeggen is
coolassprov is een kippige soepkip die een vn resolutie aankaart, israel beschuldigd hem te schenden (terecht) en vervolgens omdat het niet in zijn straatje past vergeet dat libanon en de rest hem ook schend
mischien moeten we jou maar maroc.nl's versie van geert wilders noemen je bent net zo ongenuanceerd en 1zijdig
'Changing Shaba border will be a dangerous precedent'Yaakov Katz, THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 21, 2007www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1187502427231&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull The defense establishment is fiercely opposed to a United Nations initiative to redraw Israel's border with Lebanon and ultimately revoke Israeli sovereignty over the Shaba Farms. A UN cartographer is expected to visit the Shaba Farms, also known as Mount Dov, in the coming weeks, sent by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to review the current border route along the 25-square-kilometer area located between Lebanon and the Golan Heights. Claimed by Hizbullah as Lebanese territory, Israel says the land was conquered from Syria during the Six Day War. Last month, Ban released a report on the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended last summer's war between Israel and Hizbullah. He wrote that he was reviewing a Lebanese plan to revoke Israeli rights over the area and to place the Shaba Farms under UN jurisdiction.Defense officials warned against setting a precedent by changing the border. "If the border is changed, then this could be dangerous for Israel's national security," a senior official said. France and the United States have in the past pressured Israel to withdraw from the area as part of an effort to strengthen Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora. The size and sovereignty over the Shaba Farms has been a matter of controversy since Israel withdrew from Lebanon in 2000. Israel says the area was part of Syria and therefore it does not need to withdraw until a peace agreement is reached with Damascus. Lebanon does not accept the demarcation line and continues to claim that the area is its territory. Also on Monday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said he was surprised to see how low the IDF's emergency stockpiles were. He said the shortage in supplies, including ammunition, was the result of cuts to the defense budget in recent years. In a meeting with military correspondents, Barak said the IDF needed to increase its manpower and to establish two new divisions that would give the IDF maneuverability on the battlefield. "The next war needs to be decided in enemy territory, with minimal damage to the home front," he said.
Wat het Libanese leger niet weet....
Israeli official: UNIFIL must expandTop diplomatic source tells Ynet international community not interested in securing Lebanon-Syria border, ending weapon smuggling to Hizbullah 'due to sensitivity near border'. Meanwhile, Israel tries to make amendments to UNIFIL's mandate document to include sign of life from kidnapped soldiersRonny Sofer YNET Published: 08.20.07, 00:27 / Israel Newswww.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3439560,00.html
The international community is not willing to take on responsibility for closing the border between Lebanon and Syria in order to prevent the continued smuggling of weapons to Hizbullah, a senior Israeli official told Ynet on Sunday. UNIFIL's mandate on southern Lebanon, which was declared along with the ceasefire that ended the Second Lebanon War, will expire on August 31. In order to continue to strengthen the force in the area, which is made up of 13,286 soldiers from some 30 countries, the mandate must be renewed. This weekend the 15 members of the United Nations Security Council are scheduled to vote on renewing the mandate. American and French representatives are currently working on the formula of the resolution, and Israel and Lebanon are holding separate talks with the two countries in order to make their personal demands. Despite Jerusalem's harsh criticism against the lack of enforcement of the embargo on supplying Hizbullah with weapons, Israel does not have the ability to change the situation since Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora is the one who 'invited' the UNIFIL forces into his sovereign territory, the source explained. Most likely out of the desire to avoid a confrontation with Syria, Siniora has not requested that UNIFIL expand its mandate to the Syrian border. Also, the Israeli official explained, the international community does not have the willingness to deploy its troops to this sensitive border, for fear of casualties. Over the past two months, Israel has been holding talks with the UN and the countries that have sent troops to the UNIFIL force in an attempt to secure the Lebanon-Syria border. At this point however, it seems Israel's calls to close the border remain unanswered, and the weapon smuggling to Hizbullah has been continuing at a worrisome rate. The problem: Sensitivity near border "At the moment, the donor countries don't want to expand UNIFIL's mandate beyond the area where they are deployed in southern Lebanon. This does not necessarily have to do with Siniora's willingness or unwillingness, but with their willingness. They do not want it due to the sensitivity of the border area," the Israeli source clarified. Meanwhile, Germany was the only country to accept Israel's appeal in a limited manner. The Jewish state claimed that the failure to thwart the smuggling of weapons was sterilizing Security Council Resolution 1701. These days German is completing an experiment on the northern part of the Syria-Lebanon border, through a force stationed between the Mediterranean Sea and the northern vertex of on the border between the two countries in the east. The move has been coordinated with the Lebanese government. Initial recommendations and conclusions from this experiment have been submitted to the Lebanese government, in order to examine ways to work together with the approval of the UN. In the meantime, however, it is unclear whether this experiment will lead to an extension of UNIFIL's mandate. Israel is now seeking to make slight amendments in the multinational forces' mandate document: A call for the release of kidnapped soldiers Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser, a call for a sign of life from them, a warning that the situation in Lebanon is dangerous for the region and for world peace, a clarification that the area between the Litani River and the Blue Line must remain clean of weapons and militias, and increasing the cooperation between UNIFIL and the Lebanese army. Israel will be forced to delay its demand to close the border for arms smuggling to Hizbullah until the donor countries and the Lebanese prime minister accept its other demands. "The decision to expand UNIFIL's mandate is a technical decision," the senior Israeli sources clarified. "It does not touch on Resolution 1701 on the ceasefire. We are now working to emphasize clauses in the resolution which are important to Israel, but not to change UNIFIL's mandate and expand it to the Syria-Lebanon border."
Coolassprov MC
26-08-07, 12:17
Geplaatst door observer
coolassprov is een kippige soepkip die een vn resolutie aankaart, israel beschuldigd hem te schenden (terecht) en ...
Israel lapt in haar eentje meer VN-resoluties aan de laars, dan alle VN-resolutie-aan-de-laars-lap-landen bijelkaar;
om er eentje aan te kaarten,
kan dus nog nauwelijks als een uitdaging gezien worden;
er moet dus meer aan de hand zijn met die 1701...
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Voor die oorlog werd door de smerige Zionisten R1701 aangehaald.
Geplaatst door observer
...en vervolgens omdat het niet in zijn straatje past vergeet dat libanon en de rest hem ook schend
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
En dat is jullie hele argument; zij doen het ook, dus mogen we het er niet over hebben.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Israel lapt in haar eentje meer VN-resoluties aan de laars, dan alle VN-resolutie-aan-de-laars-lap-landen bijelkaar;
om er eentje aan te kaarten,
kan dus nog nauwelijks als een uitdaging gezien worden;
er moet dus meer aan de hand zijn met die 1701... alle partijen hebben boter op hun hoofd ik durf dat te stellen jij ziet alleen wat israel doet of niet doet
grappig dezelfde resolutie die zegt dat er een palestijnse staat moet komen doet ook het bestaansrecht van israel erkennen wat meteen het probleem eerlijk weergeeft, zonder veiligheid en erkenning van israel zal er nooit een levensvatbare palestijnse staat komen, maar israel zal nooit vrede kennen zonder palestijnse staat
Coolassprov MC
27-08-07, 06:24
Geplaatst door observer
alle partijen hebben boter op hun hoofd ik durf dat te stellen jij ziet alleen wat israel doet of niet doet
Ik kan mijn stellingniet duidelijker formuleren dan ik gedaan heb; klaarblijkelijk ontbreekt het je een open en begrijpende geest; ik ga mezelf ook niet herhalen in iedere taal tot je mijn stelling wel snapt of begrijpt.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Ik kan mijn stellingniet duidelijker formuleren dan ik gedaan heb; klaarblijkelijk ontbreekt het je een open en begrijpende geest; ik ga mezelf ook niet herhalen in iedere taal tot je mijn stelling wel snapt of begrijpt. wie is hier nu niet open of begrijpend? de persoon die de fouten van beide partijen ziet of de persoon die alleen de fouten van 1 kant ziet?
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Ik kan mijn stellingniet duidelijker formuleren dan ik gedaan heb; klaarblijkelijk ontbreekt het je een open en begrijpende geest; ik ga mezelf ook niet herhalen in iedere taal tot je mijn stelling wel snapt of begrijpt.
Je hebt nog helemaal geen stelling geformuleerd!
Coolassprov MC
27-08-07, 15:41
Geplaatst door Slinger
Je hebt nog helemaal geen stelling geformuleerd!
Welles.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Welles. pffff ga een schone luier aandoen en naar de fabeltjeskrant kijken :zweep:
Goed zeg zo'n dubbele toeziende macht. Zaten de VN-ners en het Libanese leger te klaverjassen of zo?
Barak: Hizbullah has more rockets than last yearJPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 27, 2007www.jpost.com /servlet/Satellite?cid=1188197167165&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Hizbullah has more rockets than it possessed at the beginning of the Second Lebanon War, Labor Chairman Ehud Barak said during his first appearance as defense minister before the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Monday. Barak, who briefed members on the latest security developments in the region, told the committee that the group's arms supply was increasing and that Israel must begin to internalize this. The rockets are located far from the border with Israel, north of the Litani river but within striking range of Israel, Barak told the FADC. According to Likud Knesset member Yuval Steinitz, the number of rockets represented a 40 to 50 percent increase over the rocket figure before last summer'swar. Amir Peretz, who was defense minister at the time of the war, said that Israel "was in a coma" on the eve of the war. He warned that the state must take action against the smuggling of weapons from Syria to Lebanon. Addressing Syria, Barak said that Israel was not interested in an escalation in the Middle East. According to the defense minister, the IDF had seen signs of tensions dissolving between the two countries. "Assad Junior is just like Assad Senior," Barak said, referring to Syrian President Bashar Assad and his late father and former president Hafez Assad, adding that "the key to beginning negotiations is in his [Assad's] hands." The minister summarized the main principles of his outlook on the defense mechanism - an active anti-rocket and missile system; an improvement to the IDF's maneuvering ability in terms of order of battle and protection; an increase in the army's logistical stamina regarding inventory and provisions; an increase in the number of training exercises using live ammunition and finally, the military's "long arm" - its ability to operate deep within enemy territory.Speaking of the continued armament of Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip, Barak emphasized that he was pleased with the army's initiative actions against terror cells and promised that "the IDF's free hand would continue." AP contributed to this report.
Ik vind het altijd een leuke sport om de artikelen te lezen, deze te vergelijken met de topic titels die Coolassprov uit zijn duim zuigt en vervolgens hem erop te wijzen dat die 'vaak' totaal niet overeenkomen.
Helaas is mijn Arabisch wat roestig, maar gelukkig hebben we Observer en Slinger nog. :giechel: :giechel: :giechel:
Geplaatst door Freesaf2
Helaas is mijn Arabisch wat roestig, maar gelukkig hebben we Observer en Slinger nog. :giechel: :giechel: :giechel:
:haha:
waarom isa dit nieuws van de dag? :haha: sinds wanneer wordt er door wie dan ook hier in het middenoosten VN resoluties nageleefd?
Geen enkel land hier houd zich aan resoluties of mensenrechten en geen enkel land op zich kan je verplichten zich er aan te houden want geen enkele tegenpartij houd zich er aan (en dat geld gewoon voor waar en aan welke kant je ook staat)
Geplaatst door Raffi
:haha:
waarom isa dit nieuws van de dag? :haha: sinds wanneer wordt er door wie dan ook hier in het middenoosten VN resoluties nageleefd?
Geen enkel land hier houd zich aan resoluties of mensenrechten en geen enkel land op zich kan je verplichten zich er aan te houden want geen enkele tegenpartij houd zich er aan (en dat geld gewoon voor waar en aan welke kant je ook staat)
Altijd wordt weer door dit soort topics aangetoond dat de waarheid veel genuanceerder is en niet één schuldige valt aan te wijzen, zeker Israël niet. Integendeel, ze tonen aan dat in veruit de meeste gevallen het Israël is dat reageert, ipv ageert. Het is mij niet duidelijk waarom Cool dat nog niet doorheeft.
Geplaatst door Slinger
Altijd wordt weer door dit soort topics aangetoond dat de waarheid veel genuanceerder is en niet één schuldige valt aan te wijzen, zeker Israël niet. Integendeel, ze tonen aan dat in veruit de meeste gevallen het Israël is dat reageert, ipv ageert. Het is mij niet duidelijk waarom Cool dat nog niet doorheeft. heel simpel om te lezen moet je ook willen lezen
Geplaatst door observer
heel simpel om te lezen moet je ook willen lezen
Allemaal ouwe koek natuurlijk.....maar sommigen willen gewoon blind zijn.
Lebanon/Israel: Hezbollah Rockets Targeted Civilians in 2006 War Attacks on Northern Israel Violated Laws of Warhttp://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/08/30/lebano16740.htm [for complete report http://hrw.org/reports/2007/iopt0807/ ] (Beirut, August 29, 2007) - During the 2006 war, Hezbollah fired thousands of rockets indiscriminately and at times deliberately at civilian areas in northern Israel, killing at least 39 civilians, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Human Rights Watch said that Hezbollah's justifications for its attacks on Israeli towns - as a response to indiscriminate Israeli fire into southern Lebanon and to draw Israel into a ground war - had no legal basis under the laws of war. The 128-page report, "Civilians under Assault: Hezbollah's Rocket Attacks on Israel in the 2006 War," presents more than 20 case studies based on extensive field research in northern Israel into rocket attacks that killed or injured civilians in Jewish, Arab and mixed villages, towns and cities. It also draws evidence of Hezbollah's intent behind these rocket attacks from more than 100 Hezbollah communiques and declarations. "Hezbollah's explanations for why it fired rockets at Israel's civilian population utterly fail to justify these unlawful attacks," said Sarah Leah Whitson, director of Human Rights Watch's Middle East and North Africa division. In their statements, Hezbollah leaders repeatedly threatened to attack Israeli towns and settlements in retaliation for Israeli attacks on Lebanese towns - a rationale that under international humanitarian law does not justify deliberate or indiscriminate attacks on civilians. Hezbollah also claimed responsibility for specific attacks on Israeli towns and settlements, even as they voiced support for the principle of sparing civilians. Statements by leaders in the military chain of command indicating intent to fire indiscriminately toward civilian areas are evidence of war crimes. Hezbollah rockets, some carrying anti-personnel steel spheres, repeatedly hit populated areas in northern Israel. Human Rights Watch found that numerous rockets were fired in which there was no apparent legitimate military target in the vicinity at the time of the attack, indicating that civilians were deliberately attacked. For example, hundreds of rockets struck inside Karmiel, Nahariya, and Kiryat Shmona, cities containing no significant military assets. In other cases, a military objective was located in the vicinity, but even assuming that Hezbollah had intended to hit the military target instead of civilians, the inaccurate rockets it used were incapable of distinguishing between the two, making the attack indiscriminate. Hezbollah rockets killed at least 39 Israeli civilians during the conflict and inflicted moderate or serious injuries on 101 more. They struck three hospitals, an elementary school in Kiryat Yam, and a post office in Haifa. Hezbollah's rocket campaign crippled economic activity and daily life in much of northern Israel, forcing several hundred thousand civilians either to flee south or to hide in shelters and "safe rooms." Hezbollah stated that it targeted and hit Israeli military objectives more than is known, and blamed Israeli censorship for covering up the extent of such attacks. However, Hezbollah attacks on legitimate military objectives, whatever their extent, do not justify the attacks that were indiscriminate or deliberately targeted civilians. Hezbollah forces fired long-range, unguided rockets, referred to as "Katyushas," that were highly inaccurate and could not distinguish between civilians and military objectives. Fired toward cities and towns, such attacks showed, at minimum, a reckless disregard for civilians, and frequently hit civilians and civilian objects deliberately or indiscriminately. Many rockets that hit the most densely populated coastal areas - the city of Haifa and the string of its suburbs to the north and east known as HaKrayot - were 220 millimeter rockets packed with thousands of 6 millimeter steel spheres that when released in an explosion are devastating anti-personnel weapons. Incapable of inflicting serious damage to hard military structures or materiel, they penetrate human flesh and organs within a wide radius of the warhead blast. Hezbollah also fired into civilian areas cluster munition rockets loaded with submunitions that are designed to disperse, on impact, 3 millimeter steel spheres over a wide area. The Israel Police says that it examined 118 rocket strikes with cluster munitions. In other reports, Human Rights Watch has addressed other aspects of the conflict, including violations by Israel in its conduct of hostilities. A major Human Rights Watch study, titled "Why They Died: Civilian Deaths in Lebanon during the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War," will be released in September. Human Rights Watch at all times measures each party's compliance with its obligations under the laws of war, rather than compare the behavior of one side with the conduct of other parties to the conflict. Under those laws, violations by one party to a conflict do not excuse or mitigate violations committed by the other. In "Civilians under Assault," Human Rights Watch urges Hezbollah, as a matter of practice and doctrine, to cease all attacks that deliberately target civilians, as well as those that cannot discriminate between civilians and combatants, and to renounce publicly the argument that attacks on Israeli civilians are permissible as reprisals for Israeli attacks on Lebanese civilians. The report calls on the government of Lebanon to interdict the delivery of rockets to Hezbollah so long as it uses them, or subscribes to a doctrine that would permit use of them, to fire deliberately or indiscriminately into civilian areas. The report also urges the governments of Syria and Iran not to permit the transfer to Hezbollah of materiel, including rockets that Hezbollah has used in violation of international humanitarian law. Human Rights Watch said that in some instances Israel located its own fixed and mobile military assets in or near civilian areas of northern Israel, raising questions of whether it complied fully with the norm requiring it to avoid, to the extent feasible, locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas and to adequately protect all citizens residing near military assets. While this practice did not diminish Hezbollah's responsibility to discriminate at all times between noncombatants and legitimate military targets, Human Rights Watch urges the government of Israel to take all feasible steps to locate military objectives away from densely populated areas and to ensure adequate measures to protect all civilians, on an equal basis, who may be at increased risk of enemy fire due to their proximity to Israeli military assets. Finally, noting that both the Lebanese and Israeli governments have failed so far to investigate violations of international humanitarian law committed in the course of the 2006 war, Human Rights Watch recommends that the United Nations secretary-general establish an international commission of inquiry to investigate reports of violations of international humanitarian law, including possible war crimes, in Lebanon and Israel and to formulate recommendations with a view to holding accountable those who violated the law. "Hezbollah, like Israel, must respect the laws of war," said Whitson. "Unless those responsible on both sides are held accountable for their actions, instead of being allowed to hide behind the violations of their adversary, we fear that civilians inevitably will continue to pay a costly price."
Coolassprov MC
31-08-07, 11:20
Geplaatst door Slinger
Altijd wordt weer door dit soort topics aangetoond dat de waarheid veel genuanceerder is en niet één schuldige valt aan te wijzen, zeker Israël niet. Integendeel, ze tonen aan dat in veruit de meeste gevallen het Israël is dat reageert, ipv ageert. Het is mij niet duidelijk waarom Cool dat nog niet doorheeft.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
En dat is jullie hele argument; zij doen het ook, dus mogen we het er niet over hebben.
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Voor die oorlog werd door de smerige Zionisten R1701 aangehaald.
Coolassprov MC
31-08-07, 11:22
Geplaatst door ronald
Hezbollah Rockets Targeted Civilians in 2006 War Attacks on Northern Israel Violated Laws of War
Joh!
Coolassprov MC
31-08-07, 11:30
Wat ons Slingertje en ronaldje moeten doen, om te bewijzen dat zij, in tegenstelling tot mij, niet eenzijdig zijn.
Dit kunnen zij ''vrij eenvoudig'' doen door een hunner citaat aan te halen uit de discussie van vorige zomer inzake de vernietiging van half libanon door hun zo gekoesterde zionistenstaat. Een citaat waaruit blijkt dat hun zo gekoesterde zionistenstaat niet geheel vrij van zonden was (zoals blijkt uit mijner artikel) toen het op hypocriete wijze aanspraak maakt erop R1701.
Blijft hunner citaat uit, dan is hun beschuldiging van eenzijdigheid aan mijn adres niets meer dan een continuering van hun hypocrisie.
I
am
w a i t i n g
. . .
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Wat ons Slingertje en ronaldje moeten doen, om te bewijzen dat zij, in tegenstelling tot mij, niet eenzijdig zijn.
Dit kunnen zij ''vrij eenvoudig'' doen door een hunner citaat aan te halen uit de discussie van vorige zomer inzake de vernietiging van half libanon door hun zo gekoesterde zionistenstaat. Een citaat waaruit blijkt dat hun zo gekoesterde zionistenstaat niet geheel vrij van zonden was (zoals blijkt uit mijner artikel) toen het op hypocriete wijze aanspraak maakt erop R1701.
Blijft hunner citaat uit, dan is hun beschuldiging van eenzijdigheid aan mijn adres niets meer dan een continuering van hun hypocrisie.
I
am
w a i t i n g
. . . aanspraak maken op deze resolutie (al zijn er inderdaad genoeg punten waarop dat kan) is overdreven en trouwens onnodig israel en libanon zijn nog steeds in oorlog met elkaar dus het israelische leger (en het libanese) mag schieten wat het wil
Coolassprov MC
31-08-07, 12:14
Geplaatst door observer
aanspraak maken op deze resolutie (al zijn er inderdaad genoeg punten waarop dat kan) is overdreven en trouwens onnodig israel en libanon zijn nog steeds in oorlog met elkaar dus het israelische leger (en het libanese) mag schieten wat het wil
Het is goe dmet je
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Joh!
Ja wat wil je.... HRW is niet zo precies met timing... Ik geef toe, over het algemeen zitten zijn ze er te snel bij...
Geplaatst door Coolassprov MC
Het is goe dmet je
Krijg je een antwoord en wat doe je ermee? Zinde je niet. Maar we zijn in de discussie allang een paar stappen verder hoor.