Bekijk Volledige Versie : US protestors: End the Federal Reserve
US protestors: End the Federal Reserve
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:43:37 GMT
The "End the Fed" organization has some notable supporters, including former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.
Protesters across 38 cities in the US have called for the end of the Federal Reserve, which they blame for the current economic crisis.
Trey Houchens, an organizer for the group, 'Restore the Republic', was demonstrating in front of the Federal Reserve building in Washington and told PressTV that the Federal Reserve “is an institution that has been stealing our prosperity.”
Protestors said that if the Federal Reserve continues to spend and regulate credit at the present rate, the American economy will collapse.
Another protestor told PressTV's Jihan Hafiz that Fed chief, Ben Bernanke, “held a gun to our head, asking for the bailout… anything that he says will make the market go down. Its just outright theft.”
Bernanke, along with treasury secretary, Hank Paulson, was the key architect behind the $700 billion bailout bill that was passed in October. Many criticized the controversial bill for handing US taxpayer money back to the same financial institutions that caused the current financial turmoil in the first place.
There were also demands that control of monetary policy be returned to Congress, and not left in the hands of an unelected and 'unconstitutional' private organization.
“We have to wrestle that power back from those private bankers, give it back to its rightful owner, the government, the people,” said Gary Franchi, National Director of 'Restore the Republic'.
Looking forward, some protestors cast doubt on President-elect Obama's promise of change, pointing out his close connection to 'corporate America.'
WR/CW/DT
US protestors: End the Federal Reserve
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:43:37 GMT
The "End the Fed" organization has some notable supporters, including former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.
Protesters across 38 cities in the US have called for the end of the Federal Reserve, which they blame for the current economic crisis.
Trey Houchens, an organizer for the group, 'Restore the Republic', was demonstrating in front of the Federal Reserve building in Washington and told PressTV that the Federal Reserve “is an institution that has been stealing our prosperity.”
Protestors said that if the Federal Reserve continues to spend and regulate credit at the present rate, the American economy will collapse.
Another protestor told PressTV's Jihan Hafiz that Fed chief, Ben Bernanke, “held a gun to our head, asking for the bailout… anything that he says will make the market go down. Its just outright theft.”
Bernanke, along with treasury secretary, Hank Paulson, was the key architect behind the $700 billion bailout bill that was passed in October. Many criticized the controversial bill for handing US taxpayer money back to the same financial institutions that caused the current financial turmoil in the first place.
There were also demands that control of monetary policy be returned to Congress, and not left in the hands of an unelected and 'unconstitutional' private organization.
“We have to wrestle that power back from those private bankers, give it back to its rightful owner, the government, the people,” said Gary Franchi, National Director of 'Restore the Republic'.
Looking forward, some protestors cast doubt on President-elect Obama's promise of change, pointing out his close connection to 'corporate America.'
WR/CW/DT
John F. Kennedy vs The Federal Reserve
John P. Curran
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.
“United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
xoxox
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
Wellicht de enige echte reden waarom JFK Keneddy werd vermoord door de Zionistische Lobby....
Interssante stelling. De FED heeft heel veel macht in de wereld. Zij besturen ook het IMF en de wereldbank. Vervolgens schiet je mijns inziens wel een beetje door door het neerschieten van JFK aan de FED te linken.
Interssante stelling. De FED heeft heel veel macht in de wereld. Zij besturen ook het IMF en de wereldbank. Vervolgens schiet je mijns inziens wel een beetje door door het neerschieten van JFK aan de FED te linken.
Wizdom heeft gelijk met zijn topic.
John f Kennedy wilde destijds een paar dingen veranderen.
1. de FED terug geven aan de staat america.
Hij wilde weer een eigen munt creeeren die van hen was.
De dag dat hij vermoord werd,en Johnson werd ingehuldigd,ze als eerste die wet terug draaide.
2.Hij wilde ook Israel controleren op hun kernwapenarsenaal.
ook dan trap je tegen zere schenen aan.
3.Hij wilde geen nieuwe oorlog beginnen in azie.
Deze 3 factoren spelen wel dergelijk een rol bij de moord op JFK.
Want alle drie hebben te maken met de FED.
De elitebende wat de FED heeft overgenomen in 1913 zijn allen de creators van israel,de wapenlobby,en de moneymasters.
Hun inkomen en rijkdommen zijn gigantisch.
Alleen al het vermogen van de Rotshilds vandaag de dag word geschat op 500 biljoen dollar.
Dan heb ik niet eens de Rockefellers en JP-morgan,warburgs en dergelijk mee gerekend.
Hun tentakels reiken van tokio tot new York.
Van Johannesburg tot moskou.
Zij maken regeringen en breken ze af.
Ook monarchienen kunnen zij breken.
Het ottomaanse rijk en het Russische rijk is door hen ten val gebracht.
Dus wat is JFK eigenlijk daarmee vergeleken.
ps.
http://achtergeslotendeuren.punt.nl/index.php?r=1&id=263772&tbl_archief=0#263772
De geschiedenis van de bankiers en het Huis Rothschild
"De weinigen die het systeem zullen begrijpen, zullen zo geïnteresseerd zijn in haar winsten of zo afhankelijk zijn van haar gunsten, dat er geen oppositie in deze klasse zal zijn, terwijl anderzijds de grote massa aan mensen, geestelijk onbekwaam om de enorme voordelen te begrijpen…. de last (het systeem) zonder klachten zal dragen, en wellicht niet door zal hebben dat het systeem vijandig is aan hun grootste belangen."
- Rothschild Brothers Londen, communiqué to associates in New York, June 25, 1863 -
http://achtergeslotendeuren.punt.nl/index.php?r=1&id=263832&tbl_archief=0#263832
Zo had Nathan Rothschild na 17 jaar in Londen te hebben vertoefd zijn bedrag van 20.000 pond wat hij van zijn vader had mee gekregen zo’n 2500 keer verdubbeld waarbij hij een kapitaal had van ruim 50.000.000 pond (daarbij moet men nog de winsten optellen die de rest van zijn broers hadden vergaard - het Rothschildfortuin wordt voor die tijd geschat op meer dan 300.000.000 pond).
http://achtergeslotendeuren.punt.nl/index.php?r=1&id=264306&tbl_archief=0#264306
Het Federal Reserve System
"Ik ben bang dat de gewone burger het niet leuk zal vinden om te horen dat de banken geld kunnen creëren [wat ze ook doen]… en zij die het krediet van de natie controleren, leiden het staatsbeleid van de overheden, en houden het lot van de mensen in de palm van hun hand."
- Reginald McKenna (1863-1943), Secretary to the Treasury, First Lord of the Admiralty, Chairman of the Midland Bank (1918)
Zo had Nathan Rothschild na 17 jaar in Londen te hebben vertoefd zijn bedrag van 20.000 pond wat hij van zijn vader had mee gekregen zo’n 2500 keer verdubbeld waarbij hij een kapitaal had van ruim 50.000.000 pond (daarbij moet men nog de winsten optellen die de rest van zijn broers hadden vergaard - het Rothschildfortuin wordt voor die tijd geschat op meer dan 300.000.000 pond).
Dus als je 20.000 pond 2500 keer verdubbelt krijg je 50.000.000 pond. Ik zie dat het gaat om hetzelfde rekenwonder die het geschatte vermogen van die Rothschilds van je op 500 triljoen beraamde. Maar de bronvermelding is dan wel weer uitstekend op die link van je :hihi:
Dus als je 20.000 pond 2500 keer verdubbelt krijg je 50.000.000 pond. Ik zie dat het gaat om hetzelfde rekenwonder die het geschatte vermogen van die Rothschilds van je op 500 triljoen beraamde. Maar de bronvermelding is dan wel weer uitstekend op die link van je :hihi:
Een triljoen is geen biljoen.
:zwaai:
Een triljoen is geen biljoen.
:zwaai:
Ik denk niet dat de schrijver van dat artikel dit forum leest.
Ik denk niet dat de schrijver van dat artikel dit forum leest.
Ik denk het dus wel hé.
Niet speciaal alles.
Ik bedoel de herschrijver van dat verhaal.
Dus als je 20.000 pond 2500 keer verdubbelt krijg je 50.000.000 pond. Ik zie dat het gaat om hetzelfde rekenwonder die het geschatte vermogen van die Rothschilds van je op 500 triljoen beraamde. Maar de bronvermelding is dan wel weer uitstekend op die link van je :hihi:
Bij 5x verdubbelen heb je:
3,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 pond
Bij 25x verdubbelen heb je:
335,544,320,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pond
Bij 50x verdubbelen heb je:
1.E+215
(Helaas ik heb geen super computer beschikbaar om een dergelijk getal verder uit te rekenen).
Bij 5x verdubbelen heb je:
3,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 pond
Bij 25x verdubbelen heb je:
335,544,320,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pond
Bij 50x verdubbelen heb je:
1.E+215
(Helaas ik heb geen super computer beschikbaar om een dergelijk getal verder uit te rekenen).
Een HPP doet het ook:
log (2 ** 2500) = 0.3010 * 2500 = 752,5 -> 2**2500 : 3 met 752 nullen
* 20.000 = 6 met 756 nullen :
6, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
Toch knap van die Rothschilds.
Een HPP doet het ook:
log (2 ** 2500) = 0.3010 * 2500 = 752,5 -> 2**2500 : 3 met 752 nullen
* 20.000 = 6 met 756 nullen :
6, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000
Vergeet niet dat dit in 1817 was. Er van uitgaande dat ze minimaal 10% rendement per jaar hadden, is hun huidige geschatte vermogen dus 1.1^191*6E756 = 5E764 pond.
Maar wel de credit crises aftrekken he?
Dus -25% * 5E764 = minder, maar nog genoeg.