PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Rel in Egypte over artikel over polygamie voor vrouwen



mark61
19-12-09, 14:27
Female polygamy article sparks row in Egypt
By Sebastian Usher
BBC News

A member of the Egyptian parliament has filed a lawsuit over an article questioning why polygamy is allowed for men in Islam but not for women.

The article in the newspaper Al Masry Al Youm was written by a female Saudi journalist, Nadine al-Bedair.

It has been denounced by some Muslim clerics as inflammatory and anti-Islamic.

But others have said it serves the purpose of highlighting how badly some husbands treat their wives.


The article was clearly meant to cause a big stir and it has.

Published in the independent newspaper Al Masry Al Youm, the article by Nadine al-Bedair suggests that polygamy should either be allowed for both men and women - or else there should be a new concept of marriage where men are not allowed to take a new wife just because they are bored with the old one.

'Promoting vice'

In Islam, men can marry four women at the same time - but only if they can treat them all equally.

In practice, women in more traditional parts of the Arab world can suddenly find themselves after years of marriage with few or no rights if their husband chooses to take a new wife.

The article has drawn predictably strong criticism from some Muslim authorities in Egypt, with one saying the author had no right to attack Islamic traditions and had to be stopped.

An Egyptian MP has taken up that gauntlet, filing a legal complaint against the paper, accusing it of promoting vice.

Other clerics have said male polygamy serves a social purpose, allowing widows, divorcees and unmarried women to find a partner.

But one cleric at least has taken a different tack.

He says the article is clearly not an actual call for female polygamy, but an appeal for people to wake up and see how badly some women are treated by their husbands.

Abu_Hurayrah
19-12-09, 14:31
In Islam, men can marry four women at the same time - but only if they can treat them all equally.


Two, three or four and otherwise only one that is...

Iznogoodh
20-12-09, 13:37
De ouwe, baardige bokken ziijn natuurlijk de eersten om te protesteren. Allemaal male chauvinist pigs.

Tomas
20-12-09, 14:08
...otherwise only one that is...

't zit diep.

Abu_Hurayrah
20-12-09, 15:11
't zit diep.

If you say so.

..., two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or... [4:3]

Charlus
20-12-09, 16:08
<...>two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or<...>
Begrijp ik nu goed dat jij deze praktijk goedkeurt aangezien de man dient te bepalen of hij in staat is om meerdere vrouwen gelijkelijk te bejegenen? Er moet een reden zijn waarom je dit aspect benadrukt. Je probeert aan de onwetenden hier duidelijk te maken dat er niks mis het met het systeem omdat de man dient te bepalen etc.? Je probeert dat jezelf duidelijk te maken?

Abu_Hurayrah
20-12-09, 16:15
Begrijp ik nu goed dat jij deze praktijk goedkeurt aangezien de man dient te bepalen of hij in staat is om meerdere vrouwen gelijkelijk te bejegenen? Er moet een reden zijn waarom je dit aspect benadrukt. Je probeert aan de onwetenden hier duidelijk te maken dat er niks mis het met het systeem omdat de man dient te bepalen etc.? Je probeert dat jezelf duidelijk te maken?

Ik heb niks tegen geïnstitutionaliseerde polygamie. Maar dat was niet de hoofdreden voor mijn eerste reactie.

De reden daarvan was dat in het Engelse artikel het volgende wordt gesteld:

In Islam, men can marry four women at the same time - but only if they can treat them all equally.

Dit zou de veronderstelling kunnen wekken dat het om 1 vrouw gaat en anders om 4 vrouwen. Terwijl het er ook 2 of 3 kunnen zijn, vandaar dus mijn nuancering.