PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : De slachting in de kathedraal van Bagdad is onderdeel van het Westers plan van “verdeel en heers”



aboenoeh
15-11-10, 18:13
Friday, November 12, 2010The Baghdad Cathedral Massacre: Zionist Fingerprints All Over

by Jonathan Azaziah



Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli occupation of Iraq, Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity that paralleled that of occupied Palestine before the Zionist occupation in 1948. It is egregious. Disgusting. Despicable. Ignorant. Absurd. And erroneous on every factual basis to assert that the aforementioned ethnic and religious groups are now massacring each other, when in reality, they are being massacred by the murderous occupation armies.



Dividing Iraq via partition and driving it into a hell of ethnic cleansing was a Zionist plot that was originally designed in 1982 by Israeli foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon (1). The policies for destabilizing Iraq were reestablished in the ‘Clean Break' papers written for mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu by Zionist spy Richard Perle and several Zionist war criminals including Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Meyrav Wurmser and Robert Loewenberg (2). Agents of the international terrorist group known as Mossad have been operating in Iraq as early as the 1950s, when the Zionist entity engaged in a false flag campaign of terror against the Iraqi-Jewish community (3). It has always been the absolute goal of the illegitimate usurping entity to destroy Iraq as a nation, so it can bring its ‘Greater Israel' dream to fruition, settling its colonial extremists on the banks of the ancient Tigris and Euphrates rivers.



The bloody travesty of humanity that occurred on October 31st, 2010 which left 58 Iraqis dead in the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral in Baghdad (4) was not the work of Al-Qaeda. The gunmen didn't belong to Islamic State of Iraq. The homicidal shooters weren't even Iraqi. The best way to honor the victims of senseless violence is to expose the truth of the attack. And the truth is, this massacre has Zionist fingerprints all over its blood-drenched structure.



SITE Intelligence: Mouthpiece of Mossad



As the events that led up to the massacre unfolded, the Zionist mainstream media reported that an Al-Qaeda offshoot known as Islamic State of Iraq was behind the horrors. The media obtained its reports from an organization known as SITE Intelligence Group (5). SITE is the primary source that the falsehood-spewing Zionist media, Zionist-designed Homeland Security, and even the FBI and CIA obtain their information from regarding Muslim and Arab affairs (6). When Israel is accused of a crime, SITE says otherwise and the media follows SITE's lead. When SITE says Muslims commit a crime, the media follows SITE's lead as well. SITE is controlled by Rita Katz, a former soldier in Israel's Occupation Forces who has close ties to Mossad via her working relationship with Mossad agent Ben Venzke's Intel Center (7), as well as the FBI (8). Katz, who comes from a deep-rooted Zionist family and whose father was executed in Iraq due to his spy activity for the Zionist regime, has admitted to disseminating false information to the United States government itself about ‘Jihadists,' Al-Qaeda, and other ‘Islamic extremist' groups (9).



Rita Katz collaborated with fellow Zionist Jane Harman, by delivering testimony on ‘Islamic terrorists' using the internet as a weapon, before a congressional committee so the ardently pro-Israel congresswoman could pass Orwellian legislation to monitor anti-Zionist and anti-war activism online (10). Katz violated the privacy of hundreds of Muslim-Americans in their mosques, community centers and other social functions by illegally spying on them on behalf of the US government, and is currently being sued by several organizations (11). The former Israeli soldier is considered to be a protege of Zionist Steve Emerson (12), the notorious xenophobic propagator of Islamophobia, whitewasher of Zionist crimes against Palestinians and Lebanese and creator of the repulsive propaganda film, ‘Jihad In America (13).' Rita Katz's SITE organization has even been endorsed by the bloodthirsty killers at Blackwater, now known as XE (14), who are responsible for civilian murders across occupied Iraq, including the infamous massacre at Nisour Square (15).



Rita Katz is an ultra-Zionist who clearly works as an asset for the Israeli-invented ‘war on terror' which has claimed millions of lives in occupied Arab and Muslim lands already. Her lies have affected Iraq directly, as she has attempted to sow division through spreading lies about the long-dead CIA asset Osama Bin Laden and the Shia population of the occupied nation (16). She is a noxious propagandist whose words, writings and actions are completely immersed in unequivocal falsity for the benefit of the usurping Tel Aviv regime, and whose SITE organization is an utter fraud and obvious front for Mossad. Only the oblivious, the deaf, dumb and blind would be unable to see through her lies.



Islamic State Of Iraq Doesn't Exist



Al-Qaeda doesn't exist. It should be reiterated for emphasis: Al-Qaeda. Does. Not. Exist. Even the atrociously pro-Israel apologist news agency known as BBC has admitted this undeniable fact through a documentary it released, in which CIA agents admit that the ‘terror' organization is a sheer fabrication (17). The aforementioned Zionist propaganda outfit SITE Intelligence Group has reported Islamic State of Iraq is linked to Al-Qaeda. But if Al-Qaeda doesn't exist, how can Islamic State of Iraq be linked to it? The answer is simple: Islamic State of Iraq doesn't exist either. Something that exists can't be linked to something non-existent; such notions are the peak of illogic and preposterousness. The US military itself, most saliently a Brigadier General, have already declared that the leader of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq, Omar al-Baghdadi, is an invention (18). The officials went on to declare that they needed to give an ‘Iraqi face to a foreign-run terrorist group.' Typical.



SITE is an Israeli intelligence dummy company. Al-Qaeda and Islamic State of Iraq are Zionist-concocted fallacies. The question remains then: Who carried out the heinous massacre that martyred 58 and injured 78 others at Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral?



Karada: Crawling With Israeli Agents and Mercenaries



The Karada district of Baghdad where the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral is located, a mixed neighborhood of Sunni, Shia, and Christians, has faced atrocity after atrocity by the invaders since the savage Zionist occupation began. In March of 2008, Karada was rocked when twin IEDs detonated and murdered 68 innocents, and injured 150 others (19). In September of 2008, Karada was shaken to its core when five car bombs and IEDs exploded and claimed the lives of 27 innocents and injured 84 more (20). Earlier this year, in January, a car bomb rattled Karada and 18 lives were taken along with 80 more people being injured (21). In the summer of 2009, the churches of Karada were slammed repeatedly, including a triple IED attack in July that murdered 4 innocents and injured 20 others (22).



As is the case with every bombing, kidnaping, robbery, rape, assault and murder in occupied Iraq, not a single suspect was taken into custody by the malicious Western forces of the US and UK, nor the puppet forces of the disgraceful Iraqi regime. All of the blasts in Karada (as well as everywhere else in Iraq) were the products of IEDs and car bombs. The Zionist media propagates a ridiculous theory that the car bombs are the work of ‘Islamic militant' suicide bombers, and that the IEDs are explosives made from scratch by the same militants. This is an insult to anyone with a functioning brain. The sophisticated and destructive force of an IED, as well as the meticulousness and strategic placing of car bombs throughout Iraq, especially in Karada, can only be the work of one group in the world: the Mossad (23).



In late September of 2003, a private military contractor named Zapata Engineering began operating in occupied Iraq with a $200 million contract from the Pentagon; its function was to destroy unusable Iraqi munitions and store usable munitions in American safe houses (24). Zapata Engineering received another contract for over $32 million in February of 2004 from the Army Corps of Engineers (25). The relationship between the US occupying army and Zapata turned sour in 2005 however, when 19 of its employees were arrested by Marines after firing on American checkpoints (26). The Zapata contractors were carrying illegal weapons, which the US military identified as anti-tank weapons (27). The weapons identified were the rifles of Rafael Advanced Systems Limited, the chief weapons manufacturer of the Zionist entity (28). When the Marines took the Zapata employees into custody, the detainees claimed they were humiliated and the Marines ripped their religious medallions off of their necks; the symbol on those religious medallions was the six-pointed star found on the flag of the Zionist entity (29).



Under the microscope, Zapata Engineering is exposed as a Zionist company with offices in North Carolina, Hawaii and Tel Aviv (30). Zapata has a partnership with Rafael in the production of IEDs, with Rafael making the IEDs (many of which are equipped with depleted uranium tips) as well as the neutralization technology which it sells to the US (31), and Zapata manufacturing the triggers (32). Israeli occupation forces were even called into Iraq by high-ranking American generals to help the US ‘combat' the ‘problem' of IEDs (33). These IEDs are powerful enough to lift a 70-ton tank clear off of the ground and pierce military-grade armor; the Iraqi Resistance has noticed the high level of sophistication of these killing devices, and has made it clear that no Iraqi group has the capability to assemble such devices, although foreign intelligence and secret service agencies do (34). Though Zapata Engineering is no longer officially operating in Iraq, its Rafael Advanced Systems-linked IEDs are; wreaking havoc every single day on the innocents of occupied Iraq.



It is vital to point out, that prior to the horrific Western occupation that began in 2003, car bombs weren't detonating in Iraq. But after March 20, 2003, like the Zionist IEDs, car bombs have become a nearly-everyday occurrence that Iraqis have been forced to cope with due to the illegal and barbarous occupation. It would be a monstrous mistake to link these attacks to anyone other than the occupiers that brought this savage madness down on the ancient head of Iraq.



Contrary to Zionist hasbara, and the garbage spewed from the mouths of US-puppets within the Iraqi regime, the car bombs aren't the work of ‘suicide bombers;' they are the work of Mossad, working intimately with occupation forces (35). In fact, the car bomb has become the signature of the Zionist regime when carrying out assassinations and terror operations. The car bomb is the weapon it admitted to using to murder Lebanese Resistance Commander, the martyr Imad Mughniyeh (36). The Zionist entity used the car bomb to murder former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, as exposed by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (37). It is the weapon that the sanguinary usurping regime used to assassinate a Resistance fighter in illegally blockaded Gaza last week (38). It is the weapon that the Mossad used to murder Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al-Hakim, a fierce critic of the US occupation (which wasn't in line with the disgusting and traitorous nature of his family), in the massive bombing at the Imam Ali Mosque in Najaf that martyred 125 innocents in addition to the Ayatollah (39). And it is the weapon that has been used in an ongoing assassination campaign against Iraqi policemen and security forces (40); exactly the way IOF trained the US special forces to operate, as well as participating in the death and destruction themselves by posing as consultants (41).



It is not a coincidence by any means, that just months after the illegal occupation of Iraq began, an Israeli Center of Middle Eastern Studies was opened in Baghdad. Several Iraqi professors were sickened at the establishment of a Zionist entity satellite in the Iraqi capital, and they said in no uncertain terms that it was a Mossad front (42). Muslims and Christians united against this Mossad haven, and resisted steadfastly in a refusal to cooperate with the Zionist entity and the US (43). A week after the opening of the Israeli Center, the UN headquarters in Baghdad was destroyed by Mossad with CIA assistance (44). Mossad has been caught traveling throughout Baghdad in armored SUVs (45). Four Zionist agents were killed by the Iraqi Resistance in 2005, when they were uncovered stealing archaeological artifacts and planting car bombs (46). The evidence is astonishingly overwhelming that Mossad has swarmed Iraq, Baghdad in particular, with its IEDs and car bombs to transform Iraq into a fractured state; Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khameini, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, has stated that Washington D.C. and Tel Aviv are the ‘root causes of all terrorist operations in Iraq (47).'



Not only is Karada riddled with parasites from the illegal occupier of Palestine, it is riddled with mercenaries and private contractors; United States-backed guns for hire, usually ex-military, who shoot with impunity and sign on to have no mercy whatsoever. Karada has been assaulted by United Resources Group, who murdered two innocent Iraqi women in 2007 (48). It has been attacked by Almco, when mercenaries inside four convoys opened fire on civilians and wounded an Iraqi woman named Roba Taha (49). The residents of Karada have been terrorized by none other than the infamous Blackwater, now known as Xe (50). Dyncorp has its headquarters in Central Baghdad (51), just moments away from Karada, and its mercenaries have terrorized all of Baghdad, most notably shooting an Iraqi taxi driver dead in November of 2007 (52). As of 2009, there were over 132,000 private military contractors operating in Iraq (53), with membership across 27 private military companies (54).



Karada, a place where religious groups lived amongst each other peacefully, has been bombarded by agents of the Zionist entity, mercenaries and foreign occupiers from all angles since 2003. The fingerprints of Tel Aviv and private military contractors are revealed when the deconstruction of the official Zionist media story is brought forth and the false flag attack on the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral is uncovered.



The Massacre, The Aftermath and Maliki's Cover-Up



It's disturbingly typical that the dreadful bloodshed in Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral began with the so-called ‘militants' detonating a car bomb and four IEDs before storming the church and taking hostages (55).



A three hour bloody struggle followed before Iraqi security forces cut off the lights and entered the church to subdue the murderers and rescue the hostages. 41 Christians inside the church including 2 priests were slaughtered; 12 policemen died in the gun battle; and 5 innocents were murdered by the car bomb and the IEDs.



Though American occupation forces immediately issued a statement that they were at the scene only as advisors to provide reconnaissance, intelligence and surveillance, several eyewitnesses and a journalist noticed at least three US soldiers wearing assault gear outside of the church as well as American helicopters on Sunday night (56).



Iraqi security forces arrested five suspects and while they claimed that only some of them were not Iraqi (57), eyewitness accounts show that none of them were Iraqi, as none of them spoke Arabic in an Iraqi dialect nor with an Iraqi accent; the suspects spoke the classical form of the language which made it impossible to detect where they're from (58). In addition, the Iraqi authorities investigating the massacre discovered 6 foreign passports; three from Yemen, three from Egypt (59). Iraqi officials further discovered, that the assailants were able to pass through the occupier's security checkpoints because they were dressed up as mercenaries of foreign contracting companies (60), and in addition to the passports, they were carrying fake ids (61).



War criminal, US-puppet and traitor Nouri al-Maliki immediately identified the tragic events as the work of Al-Qaeda and laughingly identified himself as an ‘honorable Iraqi' who was horrified by the incident (62). There is nothing honorable about selling out your own countrymen to invaders; al-Maliki is a disgrace to the Iraqi people, and instead of protecting the innocents being butchered by Zionist bombs and barbaric American oppression tactics, he would rather protect George Bush from being hit with a shoe. Al-Maliki used the massacre at the Karada cathedral as a pretext to shut down Al-Baghdadia newspaper; a publication that was providing live, eyewitness courage of the events unfurling and more importantly, that has given the Iraqis themselves a voice to criticize the occupation and the government's collaboration with it (63).



Only two logical, intelligent theories could arise from the evidence presented: The shadowy assailants that stormed the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral and perpetrated the massacre weren't dressed as private military contractors and actually were private military contractors, employed by one of the agencies aforementioned; or the massacre was the sinister work of Mossad. The former theory is frail, private military contractors are hired guns, not the orchestrators of complicated false flag operations; the latter theory however, is perfectly plausible, and as the Lebanese Resistance movement of Hezbollah recently observed in a statement condemning the massacre, ‘The crime has all of the Zionist hallmarks in a Zionist scheme based on fragmenting the region into feuding entities in order to dominate it (64).'



Mossad has the ability to duplicate any passport of any nation with the technology located in an Israeli military base at Petah Tikvah; first quality passports, second quality passports and fake identifications are produced in this facility for all international operations (65). The most recent case of Mossad using fabricated passports to carry out its murderous operations would be its assassination of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai (66). Knowing Arabic has been a prerequisite to becoming a Mossad agent (and a CIA agent for that matter) for quite some time (67), and that is why to this very day, the corrosive Israeli terrorist group advertises in Israel for Arabic-speaking linguists (68). The usage of a car bomb and IEDs were damning enough to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the masked men were Mossad.



It eclipses the highest peak of inanity to believe that US occupation forces that had a security check point near the cathedral, along with helicopters hovering over the cathedral and the surrounding area to conduct reconnaissance, allowed ‘Islamic militants' to carry out ‘martyrdom' operations and take hostages before any official knew a thing about it. The US won't even allow children through a checkpoint without searching them and violating them, is it reasonable to think it would allow mercenaries armed to the teeth through one without a security check? Nonsense.



As the late Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah remarked not too long before his passing, all violence in Iraq is linked to the ‘occupation,' he said ‘the Zionist entity operates through its intelligence and political influence to keep Iraq divided (69).' America's military allowed the attackers through that checkpoint, because it was collusive in the incoming attack, as it always is. Though there is no direct evidence that the gunmen were Israeli, all of the circumstantial evidence points in only one direction as to where they came from: the usurping supremacist regime of Tel Aviv.



A Theory Based On Logic And Facts



The October 31st attack on the cathedral in the Karada district of Baghdad was a false flag operation carried out by the Mossad terror organization, with aid from the US occupation forces and collusive elements within Iraq's puppet security forces. The attack against the Iraqi Christians was meant to look like a hit from ‘radical Islamists to sow discord and division amongst Muslims and Christians and ravage the relative peace that Karada's people have experienced despite the illegal occupation, sending one more part of Iraq into absolute chaos. Using Israeli-designed ordnance and firepower, the Mossad agents were given access to the church by US forces and protected from above by American helicopters; this cover allowed them to unleash hell upon the innocents within Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral for hours before being brought to a halt by Iraqi security forces.



Carrying documents made in an Israeli intelligence stronghold in occupied Palestine, the Mossad operatives left behind Egyptian passports to perpetuate the illusion of ‘Islamic extremists,' as well as passports from Yemen to give further solidarity to the Zionist Obama administration's plot to invade the gulf state based on lies. The agents were taken into custody to complete the fraudulent operation and their identities were concealed from the press, and of course, it will remain that way. Seeking an American push in the stalemate of the disgusting sham Iraqi elections, al-Maliki weighed in by attributing the attack to Al-Qaeda despite a total lack of evidence, and with the blessing of the US, al-Maliki shuts down a newspaper that has been a thorn in the side of his puppet administration and the occupier for years. 58 innocents dead. 78 injured. No mention of Mossad, Israel or even American complicity in the crime by any Zionist media organization. Islam slandered again. Iraq's blood spilled once more. The murderers not brought to justice. The families of the martyrs angry, confused and bewildered. Zionist mission accomplished.



Conclusion: Sectarian Division or The Illusion Of It?



One of the worst tragedies of the Iraqi genocide is the near extermination of Mesopotamia's ancient Christian community; their systematic decimation is barely mentioned at all. It is shameful.



The Chaldean Christians have been under violent assault from Mossad operatives and Christian Zionist mercenary groups in Nineveh, Irbil, al-Hamdaniya, Bartella, Talasqaf, Batnaya, Bashiqa, Elkosheven, Aqrah, and Mosul (70). US officials were advised by their Israeli overlords that the Christian population of Iraq was instrumental in the fight against the British and its puppet monarch prior to the July 14th Revolution of 1958; they were advised that the elimination of the Christians as anti-occupation entity would be just as instrumental, which is why the US set up a puppet army of 200,000 men, nearly completely comprised of ‘Shia,' to be led by CIA death squads to ravage the Christian population completely (71). While the CIA and its puppet army of traitors terrorized Iraq's Christian civilians, Mossad launched a campaign of mass killing against Iraq's intellectuals, murdering 530 scientists and academics, several of whom were Assyrian and Chaldean Christians. The majority of the intellectuals had their lives taken in Baghdad universities and the universities in the southern Iraqi province of Basra (72). Hunter-killer operations continue against the Christians of Iraq at this very moment; Less than two weeks after the Sayedat al-Najat massacre, five Christians were murdered and twenty others were injured on November 10th. The bombings that claimed the innocents' lives were linked to ‘Sunni militants,' but further scrutiny of the incident reveals that a dozen roadside bombs were the cause of the mayhem (73). Roadside bombs are also known as IEDs; IEDs equal Mossad.



Muslims across the Middle East, especially in Iraq itself, have shown their solidarity with their Christian brothers and sisters while Zionist Western nations have encouraged them to leave their ancestral land. This division needs to be rejected; it is another Zionist plot to fractionalize Iraq.



‘Sunni' officials that once served as Saddam Hussein's closet advisors have been tapped by the State Department and the CIA to carry out covert operations team to track down Shia Resistance movements and obliterate them; this team was formed into an intelligence agency called the General Security Directorate, and it was led by traitor and butcher Iyad Allawi (74). The US also armed several ‘Sunni' militias to target the predominantly Shia Iraqi police force as well as weaken the Iraqi Shia Resistance fighters clashing with US occupation forces in Baghdad (75). The CIA set up another puppet intelligence group comprised of ‘Sunni' officials from Saddam's regime to crack down on Shia and Sunni Resistance in Samarra, a city holy to the Shia, respected by the Sunni, and inhabited peacefully and brotherly by both (76). Maliki's ‘Shia' police forces, at the behest of the American occupier cracked down on Shia Resistance within Baghdad, massacring hundreds of innocent Iraqi Shia (77).



The US provided arms and massive amounts of funds to the Sons of Iraq, a ‘Sunni' militia, that fought against Sunni and Shia Resistance across the occupied nation (78). The US created another ‘Shia' militia, the Zulfiqar Army, to neutralize Muqatada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, and it brutally killed dozens of Sadrist officials (79). The ‘Shia' Badr Organization has been a willing and even happy partner of the US occupation; they have not only been deeply involved in the arrest, torture and killing of Sunni Resistance fighters but the Shia Resistance as well, most prominently the Mahdi Army, who had many of their fighters massacred by Badr in 2006 (80). The Kurdish military organization Peshmerga is another willing and happy collaborator in the illegal US occupation of Iraq and has launched deadly attacks on all of Iraq's Resistance fighters, Sunni, Shia and secular. Peshmerga is fully trained, armed and financed by the Zionist entity, and several private Israeli companies operate in Iraqi Kurdistan, providing consultation and intelligence to the Kurdish collaborationists (81).



Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi, a fiery critic of the American and Israeli occupation of Iraq, as well as the puppets and traitors currently running the Iraqi government issued statements in an interview 3 years ago that are crucial to understanding so-called sectarianism; the Ayatollah remarked that when the American occupiers were faced with an increase in the Iraqi Resistance, they established collaborationist death squads to be led by US intelligence in order to discredit the real Iraqi Resistance (82).



When a US-backed, US-financed ‘Shia' organization murders a Sunni, it isn't Shia killing Sunni; it isn't sectarian violence, it is the US killing Sunni. When a US-backed, US-trained ‘Sunni' militia murders a Shia, it isn't Sunni killing Shia; it isn't sectarian violence, it is the US killing Shia. When an Israeli-armed, US-supported Kurdish security squad murders an Arab, it isn't Kurd killing Arab; it isn't killing based on ethnic hatred, it is the US killing Arabs. When US-backed, US-financed, Israeli-armed ‘Muslim' groups kill Christians, or ‘Christian' groups kill Muslims, it isn't Muslims killing Christians or Christians killing Muslims; it isn't sectarian violence, it is the US and Israel murdering Muslims and Christians. When the CIA-backed, CIA-trained, repressive dictator Saddam Hussein brutally oppressed the Shia of Iraq for decades, including the savage torture and murder of Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister, Sayyeda Amina Bint al-Huda (83), it wasn't sectarian violence; it was US-sponsored state terrorism. And when the US-backed, US-financed ‘Shia' puppet government tortures and murders Sunni dissenters, it isn't sectarian violence; it is US-sponsored state terrorism. These ‘sectarian' organizations don't just kill innocents from outside of their own ‘sects' and ethnic groups; they kill whoever criticizes the occupation and the puppet regime and whoever their American masters tell them to kill. The regimes are authoritarian and totalitarian, not sectarian.



All of these groups take their orders from Task Force 121, the elite CIA death squad that has been operating in occupied Iraq since 2003 (84) and Mossad; the crimes of these Iraqi traitors pale in comparison to the toxic crimes of the US and Zionist occupiers, but their cancerous collaboration has contributed greatly to the destruction of Iraq.



There are those who claim to stand with the oppressed; who claim to have the best interest of Iraq at heart while preaching nothing but disgusting, hateful, prejudicial propaganda and Zionist-designed sectarianism, directing the attention on the crimes committed in Iraq towards certain ethno-religious groups instead of the Zionist, American and British criminals that murdered 1.5 million innocent Iraqi men, women and children. Never mentioned by these abhorrent persons are the declarations of the Iraqi people in 2003, "We are brothers, Sunni and Shia, we are not selling our homeland (85)." Never mentioned by these debauched hate-mongers are the Sunni and Shia who stood united in Baghdad one year after the occupation to inform the occupier that its ‘divide-and-conquer' strategy failed miserably (86).



Never mentioned by these amoral, self-anointed geopolitical rejects are the thousands of Shia who gave blood to their Sunni brothers who had just been ap
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

said_soussi
16-11-10, 07:17
En hoeveel van onze broeders en zusters slachten die vervloekte honden af ?!

:auw::iblies:
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Slinger
16-11-10, 08:33
Friday, November 12, 2010The Baghdad Cathedral Massacre: Zionist Fingerprints All Over

by Jonathan Azaziah



Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli occupation of Iraq, Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity that paralleled that of occupied Palestine before the Zionist occupation in 1948.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Hear hear!

Soldim
16-11-10, 09:40
Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli


Israeli? Hmm, feiten doen er in dit artikel wellicht niet toe?



Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity

:zozo:

Propaganda verhaal, inhoudelijk zeer zwak.

The_Grand_Wazoo
16-11-10, 15:55
Plotseling heb ik het licht gezien: Mohammed was een geheime Joodse agent om het verdeelheid te zaaien onder de christenen. De eerste moslim gemeenschap was eigenlijk een door de Bilderberggroep gesubisdieerde gemeennschap en het was geen Gabriel, maar een lid van de illumati die niet in Mohammeds rechteroor, maar in zijn linkeroor zat te zwammen.

Eke
16-11-10, 16:50
Friday, November 12, 2010The Baghdad Cathedral Massacre: Zionist Fingerprints All Over

by Jonathan Azaziah



#Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli occupation of Iraq, Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity that paralleled that of occupied Palestine before the Zionist occupation in 1948.


#It is egregious. Disgusting. Despicable. Ignorant. Absurd. And erroneous on every factual basis to assert that the aforementioned ethnic and religious groups are now massacring each other, when in reality, they are being massacred by the murderous occupation armies.


__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Aboenoeh , graag maak ik 2 aantekeningen bij het eerste stukje van je lange post. De rest heb ik niet kunnen lezen.

#Het kolonialisme heeft Irak afgesneden van het grote Ottomaanse Rijk. Heb jij enig idee hoe het toen -voor de afscheiding-ging tussen Sjiieten en Soennieten ?

In ieder geval hebben de Soennieten gedurende lange tijd de Sjiieten op hun nek gezeten, toegelaten door Saddam Hoessein.
Verder waren/ zijn er ook problemen met de zelfstandigheidswensen van de Koerden. Dat zul jij beter weten dan ik.

Dankzij S. Hoesseins schrikbewind deelde het volk iets gezamenlijks :de pest aan de leider. Dat verbroederde en gemor werd meteen afgestraft : bungelen aan een touwtje op het plein....ieeeeeekh !!!!

Dus samenleven in harmonie ? Beetje veel rooskleurig beschreven :)

# Jonathan probeert de VS de schuld te geven van bloedige onlusten.
Geloof me, de VS wil liever vandaag dan morgen dat de rust weerkeert in Irak.
Eerlijk gezegd voelt ze wel verantwoordelijkheid voor die puinhoop in Irak.
Maar ...er zijn er meer verantwoordelijk !- dat weet jij ook. Die onderhandse vetes hoeft de VS niet te verzinnen. Waarom zou ze ? Ze wil uit het land weg, namelijk.

fisherman1969
16-11-10, 17:21
Aboenoeh , graag maak ik 2 aantekeningen bij het eerste stukje van je lange post. De rest heb ik niet kunnen lezen.

#Het kolonialisme heeft Irak afgesneden van het grote Ottomaanse Rijk. Heb jij enig idee hoe het toen -voor de afscheiding-ging tussen Sjiieten en Soennieten ?

In ieder geval hebben de Soennieten gedurende lange tijd de Sjiieten op hun nek gezeten, toegelaten door Saddam Hoessein.
Verder waren/ zijn er ook problemen met de zelfstandigheidswensen van de Koerden. Dat zul jij beter weten dan ik.

Dankzij S. Hoesseins schrikbewind deelde het volk iets gezamenlijks :de pest aan de leider. Dat verbroederde en gemor werd meteen afgestraft : bungelen aan een touwtje op het plein....ieeeeeekh !!!!

Dus samenleven in harmonie ? Beetje veel rooskleurig beschreven :)

# Jonathan probeert de VS de schuld te geven van bloedige onlusten.
Geloof me, de VS wil liever vandaag dan morgen dat de rust weerkeert in Irak.
Eerlijk gezegd voelt ze wel verantwoordelijkheid voor die puinhoop in Irak.
Maar ...er zijn er meer verantwoordelijk !- dat weet jij ook. Die onderhandse vetes hoeft de VS niet te verzinnen. Waarom zou ze ? Ze wil uit het land weg, namelijk.

Verwacht je nu echt een zinnig antwoord Eke ?
Ik bedoel van ABDOELTJE

Eke
17-11-10, 16:09
Verwacht je nu echt een zinnig antwoord Eke ?
Ik bedoel van ABDOELTJE

Abdoeltje ? Abeltje ...?
Maar je bedoelt Aboenoeh, Fisherman !

Ik verwacht wel een zinnig antwoord van Aboenoeh.

Hoewel hij druk bezig is met de varkens in nood in België...:hihi:
Maar ja, dit is zijn eigen topic. Een goede keuze voor NVDD.

super ick
17-11-10, 16:23
Jankstuk.
Het eigen falen afwentelen op de ander.
Zit dat in het DNA ofzo?

aboenoeh
17-11-10, 16:31
Het kolonialisme heeft Irak afgesneden van het grote Ottomaanse Rijk. Heb jij enig idee hoe het toen -voor de afscheiding-ging tussen Sjiieten en Soennieten ?


De val van het regime van president Saddam Hoessein in 2003, betekende ook het einde van de suprematie van de soennitische Arabieren in Irak. Ze werden meteen ook de zondebokken en werden weggezuiverd door de de-Baathificatie en de ontbinding van het leger. Sedert halfweg vorig jaar worden ze echt gerehabiliteerd.

De Britten, die tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog de Ottomaanse provincies Mossoel, Bagdad en Basra veroverden en die samenvoegden tot de nieuwe staat Irak, gaven begin de jaren 1920 de macht aan de Arabische soennieten. Dit alhoewel die niet de grootste bevolkingsgroep vormden. Momenteel telt Irak een bevolking van ongeveer 24 miljoen inwoners. De Arabische sjiieten vormen de grootste groep met zowat 55%, gevolgd door de Arabische soennieten met zowat 25% en de Koerden, van wie de meerderheid ook soennitische moslims zijn, met 20%.

De machtsoverdracht had praktische redenen. De Britten kregen na hun verovering te maken met sjiitische, Koerdische opstanden tegen hun aanwezigheid. De Irakezen waren blij verlost te zijn van de Ottomanen, maar wilden geen nieuwe buitenlandse heersers. Die les vergaten de Amerikanen. Die gingen er niet ten onrechte van uit dat de meerderheid van de Irakezen graag Saddam Hoessein kwijt wilde – 25% van de Irakezen heeft volgens peilingen nog heimwee naar hem – en dat ze dus welkom zouden zijn. Maar dat laatste was totaal verkeerd. Zoals de Britten kregen ze te maken met massaal verzet, dat nu al aan bijna 4.000 soldaten en wellicht tot 1 miljoen Irakezen het leven heeft gekost. Zonder dat er hoop is dat de Amerikanen ooit de bovenhand kunnen halen.

De Britten slaagden er destijds wél in het verzet te breken, zij het met gebruik van gifgas tegen sjiieten en Koerden en door het uitroeien van dorpen met hun luchtmacht. Bovendien coöpteerden ze als bestuurders – Groot-Brittannië zat financieel aan de grond aan het einde van de Eerste Wereldoorlog en was niet in staat Irak rechtstreeks onder controle te blijven houden - de groep die al militaire en bestuurservaring had: de Arabische soennieten.

Het Ottomaanse rijk was nu eenmaal een soennitisch rijk. De sultan was tevens kalief, de opvolger van de profeet Mohammed en formeel de leider van alle soennitische moslims ter wereld. Toen de Ottomanen begin de 16de eeuw Mesopotamië veroverden, maakten ze er een soennitisch bolwerk van tegen het rivaliserende Perzische rijk, dat vanaf de 16de eeuw in handen kwam van de sjiitische dynastie der Safavieden. Overigens waren de sjiieten in Irak toen in de minderheid. Eigenlijk ook in Iran, waar het sjiisme pas in de 18de eeuw de belangrijkste godsdienst werd.

Hoe dan ook de soennieten kregen van de Ottomanen het lokale bestuur in de drie provincies die nu Irak vormen en leidinggevende functies in het lokale leger
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Eke
17-11-10, 17:08
De val van het regime van president Saddam Hoessein in 2003, betekende ook het einde van de suprematie van de soennitische Arabieren in Irak. Ze werden meteen ook de zondebokken en werden weggezuiverd door de de-Baathificatie en de ontbinding van het leger. Sedert halfweg vorig jaar worden ze echt gerehabiliteerd.

De Britten, die tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog de Ottomaanse provincies Mossoel, Bagdad en Basra veroverden en die samenvoegden tot de nieuwe staat Irak, gaven begin de jaren 1920 de macht aan de Arabische soennieten. Dit alhoewel die niet de grootste bevolkingsgroep vormden. Momenteel telt Irak een bevolking van ongeveer 24 miljoen inwoners. De Arabische sjiieten vormen de grootste groep met zowat 55%, gevolgd door de Arabische soennieten met zowat 25% en de Koerden, van wie de meerderheid ook soennitische moslims zijn, met 20%.

De machtsoverdracht had praktische redenen. De Britten kregen na hun verovering te maken met sjiitische, Koerdische opstanden tegen hun aanwezigheid. De Irakezen waren blij verlost te zijn van de Ottomanen, maar wilden geen nieuwe buitenlandse heersers. Die les vergaten de Amerikanen. Die gingen er niet ten onrechte van uit dat de meerderheid van de Irakezen graag Saddam Hoessein kwijt wilde – 25% van de Irakezen heeft volgens peilingen nog heimwee naar hem – en dat ze dus welkom zouden zijn. Maar dat laatste was totaal verkeerd. Zoals de Britten kregen ze te maken met massaal verzet, dat nu al aan bijna 4.000 soldaten en wellicht tot 1 miljoen Irakezen het leven heeft gekost. Zonder dat er hoop is dat de Amerikanen ooit de bovenhand kunnen halen.

De Britten slaagden er destijds wél in het verzet te breken, zij het met gebruik van gifgas tegen sjiieten en Koerden en door het uitroeien van dorpen met hun luchtmacht. Bovendien coöpteerden ze als bestuurders – Groot-Brittannië zat financieel aan de grond aan het einde van de Eerste Wereldoorlog en was niet in staat Irak rechtstreeks onder controle te blijven houden - de groep die al militaire en bestuurservaring had: de Arabische soennieten.

Het Ottomaanse rijk was nu eenmaal een soennitisch rijk. De sultan was tevens kalief, de opvolger van de profeet Mohammed en formeel de leider van alle soennitische moslims ter wereld. Toen de Ottomanen begin de 16de eeuw Mesopotamië veroverden, maakten ze er een soennitisch bolwerk van tegen het rivaliserende Perzische rijk, dat vanaf de 16de eeuw in handen kwam van de sjiitische dynastie der Safavieden. Overigens waren de sjiieten in Irak toen in de minderheid. Eigenlijk ook in Iran, waar het sjiisme pas in de 18de eeuw de belangrijkste godsdienst werd.

Hoe dan ook de soennieten kregen van de Ottomanen het lokale bestuur in de drie provincies die nu Irak vormen en leidinggevende functies in het lokale leger
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Bedankt vast. Hartstikke interessant, Aboenoeh.

Ik kom er nog op terug. De boerenkool wacht om gestampt te worden ! :)

Eke
17-11-10, 20:41
citaat Jonathan Zazaziah :

Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli occupation of Iraq, Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity that paralleled that of occupied Palestine before the Zionist occupation in 1948.

It is egregious. Disgusting. Despicable. Ignorant. Absurd. And erroneous on every factual basis to assert that the aforementioned ethnic and religious groups are now massacring each other, when in reality, they are being massacred by the murderous occupation armies.

Aboenoeh, het artikel dat je plaatst van Paul Vanden Baviere-Uitpers België nr. 96-
in je posting van 17.34 uur hierboven,
rekent in z'n geheel af met bovenstaand citaat van Jonathan Zazaziah.


Het is een interessant en goed gevuld stuk....

Daarom wil ik ook de link erbij vermelden...enne, Aboenoeh...die bronvermelding is nog een goed internetgebruik ook .... Twee vliegkes in enen klap , zou Urbanus zeggen :hihi:

http://www.uitpers.be/printartikel.php?id=1964

ronald
17-11-10, 20:47
Plotseling heb ik het licht gezien: Mohammed was een geheime Joodse agent om het verdeelheid te zaaien onder de christenen. De eerste moslim gemeenschap was eigenlijk een door de Bilderberggroep gesubisdieerde gemeennschap en het was geen Gabriel, maar een lid van de illumati die niet in Mohammeds rechteroor, maar in zijn linkeroor zat te zwammen.

Ssssssssstttttttttttt............ niet zo hard. Die halen ze uit de hoed als de nood werkelijk aan de man is.

sjo
17-11-10, 21:04
...die bronvermelding is nog een goed internetgebruik ook ......



Elkaars bronnen afzeiken is hier ook een oude traditie hoor.

gr.
sjo

aboenoeh
17-11-10, 21:23
Aboenoeh, het artikel dat je plaatst van Paul Vanden Baviere-Uitpers België nr. 96-



rekent in z'n geheel af met bovenstaand citaat van Jonathan Zazaziah.











Het is een interessant en goed gevuld stuk....







Daarom wil ik ook de link erbij vermelden...enne, Aboenoeh...die bronvermelding is nog een goed internetgebruik ook .... Twee vliegkes in enen klap , zou Urbanus zeggen :hihi:







Uitpers: Webzine voor Internationale Politiek (http://www.uitpers.be/printartikel.php?id=1964)

__________________

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op Maroc.NL (http://www.maroc.nl/forums)



het is gemakkelijker om knip en plak werk te hanteren om mijn gedachten op scherm te zetten ,dan zelf een artikel te schrijven.



het verandert niets aan de feiten wat betreft de geschiedenis omtrend verschillende stromingen en religies binnen het Otmaanse rijk.



het is natuurlijk begrijpelijk dat Paul Vanden Baviere als voormallige middenoosten corespondent en zogezegde historicus de schandalen van zijn soorten niet aan de paal hangt.



de rest van het artikkel spreekt Jonathan Zazaziah helemaal niet tegen.

Paul Vanden Baviere zwijgt er gewoon over





dat is tenslotte de stille norm in het westen wat betreft journalistiek:vrede::vrede:
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Eke
17-11-10, 21:25
Elkaars bronnen afzeiken is hier ook een oude traditie hoor.

gr.
sjo

Dat is hier niet van toepassing, Sjo. Herlees nog maar even.
Groeten !

super ick
18-11-10, 10:18
Dant Soenieten en sjiieten elkaar de hersen in slaan is de schuld van het westen.

knuppeltje
18-11-10, 12:06
Dant Soenieten en sjiieten elkaar de hersen in slaan is de schuld van het westen.

Dat doen ze zelf, ze kunnen wel mede verantwoordelijk zijn voor het creëren van - en in stand houden van, de omstandigheden waain dat veel makkelijker gaat.

Wie die omstandigheden creëert - is daarvoor verantwoordelijk.

mark61
18-11-10, 12:46
Dant Soenieten en sjiieten elkaar de hersen in slaan is de schuld van het westen.

Dat is medeverantwoordelijk. In het Osmaanse rijk was een hoop aan de hand, maar soennitisch-sji`itische twisten in Irak waren daar niet bij. Dat is een gevolg van de 'oprichting' van Irak door Engeland. Het is dan ook een politieke kwestie, geen religieuze. Maar dat mensen elkaar de kop in slaan is hun eigen verantwoordelijkheid.

Eke
18-11-10, 13:04
het is gemakkelijker om knip en plak werk te hanteren om mijn gedachten op scherm te zetten ,



het is natuurlijk begrijpelijk dat Paul Vanden Baviere als voormallige middenoosten corespondent en zogezegde historicus de schandalen van zijn soorten niet aan de paal hangt.


de rest van het artikkel spreekt Jonathan Zazaziah helemaal niet tegen.

Paul Vanden Baviere zwijgt er gewoon over
dat is tenslotte de stille norm in het westen wat betreft journalistiek:vrede::vrede:
__________________
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst op forums.ansaar.nl

Plakken en knippen van bepaalde artikelen kan gewoon praktisch zijn :)
Weet je, de bron erbij zetten is gewoon aangeleerd. De schrijver vermelden is wel zo netjes en krant/tijdschrift/boek e.d vermelden is handig als je het geschrevene in een breder verband wilt plaatsen. Je leest bv. iets uit een tijdschrift met een hele goede reputatie. Dat geloof je dan eerder, toch ?

Aboenoeh, je bent niet alleen vrij om schandalen van je samenleving met alle bewijsstukken te beschrijven het is ook je democratische 'plicht'.
Democratie is immers gebaseerd op inspraak in het bestuur. De politieke partijen kunnen niet goed funktioneren als ze hun mond moeten houden.Je herinnert je de commissie Davids misschien nog wel, die na enkele jaren gemor (dat weer wel) samengesteld werd om de rol van Balkenende & Co. met betrekking tot de inval in Irak te onderzoeken. Lees :http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/irak-oorlog/article2456788.ece/Vijf_conclusies_commissie-Davids_nader_bekeken


Even terug naar Jonathan Zazaziah. We zijn het erover eens dat het eerste deel van z'n artikel 'klop-klop' was ? Tendentieus en vals/foutief ?
Wat heb ik voor reden om hem hierna nog te geloven in dat stuk ?Hij heeft z'n eigen glazen ingegooid.

super ick
18-11-10, 15:46
Dat is medeverantwoordelijk. In het Osmaanse rijk was een hoop aan de hand, maar soennitisch-sji`itische twisten in Irak waren daar niet bij. Dat is een gevolg van de 'oprichting' van Irak door Engeland. Het is dan ook een politieke kwestie, geen religieuze. Maar dat mensen elkaar de kop in slaan is hun eigen verantwoordelijkheid.

In Libanon ook zeker?