PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Behoor jij tot de 1%?



Soldim
05-01-12, 15:53
Globaal gezien, is het niet zo moeilijk:



It only takes $34,000 a year, after taxes, to be among the richest 1% in the world. That's for each person living under the same roof, including children. (So a family of four, for example, needs to make $136,000.)


volgens CNN in dit (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/04/news/economy/world_richest/index.htm) artikel.

(leen)
05-01-12, 19:03
Nee, en de rest van de tekst is om aan 5 tekens te komen..

mark61
05-01-12, 19:35
Globaal gezien, is het niet zo moeilijk:



volgens CNN in dit (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/04/news/economy/world_richest/index.htm) artikel.

Nee, wel tot de 2%. De opmerking over gezin is onzin. Je hebt niet hetzelfde bedrag nodig om verdere gezinsleden op hetzelfde niveau te onderhouden.

Zeker niet in NL, waar alleenstaanden worden gestraft.

naam
06-01-12, 08:06
Globaal gezien, is het niet zo moeilijk:



volgens CNN in dit (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/04/news/economy/world_richest/index.htm) artikel.

Ja, met een gezin van 4 :hihi:

Alhoewel, bruto.

Olive Yao
04-02-12, 18:41
US managers are over-priced


What they tell you

Some people are paid a lot more than others. Especially in the US, companies pay their top managers what some people consider to be obscene amounts. However, this is what market forces demand. Given that the pool of talent is limited, you simply have to pay large sums of money if you are to attract the best talents.

From the point of view of a giant corporation with billions of dollars of turnover, it is definitely worth paying extra millions, or even tens of millions, of dollars to get the best talent, as her ability to make better decisions than her counterparts in competitor companies can bring in extra hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.

However unjust these levels of compensation may appear, we should not engage in acts of envy and spite and try to artificially suppress them. Such attempts would be simply counterproductive.


What they don't tell you

US managers are over-priced in more than one sense. First, they are over-priced compared to their predecessors. In relative terms (that is, as a proportion of average worker compensation), American CEO's today are paid around ten times more than their predecessors of the 1960s, despite the fact that the latter ran companies that were much more succesful, in relative terms, that today's American companies.

US managers are also over-priced compared to their counterparts in other rich countries. In absolute terms, they are paid, depending on the meaure we use and the country we compare with, up to twenty times more than their competitors running similarly large and succesful companies.

American managers are not only over-priced but also overly protected in the sense that they do not get punished for poor performance.

And all this is not, unlike what many people argue, purely dictated by market forces. The managerial class in the US has gained such economic, political and ideological power that it has been able to manipulate the forces that determine its pay.


uit Ha-Joon Chang, 23 Things they don't tell you about capitalism
Het bovenstaande is een samenvatting van ding 14.
Ha-Joon Chang is econoom bij de universiteit van Cambridge. Het boek is in het nederlands vertaald als 23 Dingen die ze je niet vertellen over kapitalisme.



.