PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Financial Times Calls Charlie Hebdo ‘Stupid’ for ‘Provoking Muslims'



Samir75017
16-01-15, 00:36
January 7th, 2015

Hours after 12 editors and cartoonists at the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo were executed by Islamic extremists, the Financial Times‘s editorial board published a strongly-worded editorial criticizing the magazine for their “editorial foolishness.”

“If the magazine stops just short of outright insults, it is nevertheless not the most convincing champion of the principle of freedom of speech,” the London paper wrote (subscription only), noting Charlie Hebdo‘s long history of needling Muslims, Catholics, Jews, and pretty much everyone in existence. But they added: “France is the land of Voltaire, but too often editorial foolishness has prevailed at Charlie Hebdo.”

They continued:

This is not in the slightest to condone the murderers, who must be caught and punished, or to suggest that freedom of expression should not extend to satirical portrayals of religion. It is merely to say that some common sense would be useful at publications such as Charlie Hebdo, and Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, which purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims, but are actually just being stupid.

Financial Times Calls Charlie Hebdo ‘Stupid’ for ‘Provoking Muslims’ | Mediaite (http://www.mediaite.com/online/financial-times-calls-charlie-hebdo-stupid-for-provoking-muslims/)

Samir75017
16-01-15, 00:37
JeSuisFinancialTimes

Charlus
16-01-15, 01:20
De strekking is als volgt.
Niemand mag iets doen wat moslims niet leuk vinden. Anders maken ze je dood en is het je eigen schuld want je had beter kunnen en moeten weten ('Stupid'). Je was gewaarschuwd.
Maffiapraktijken.

super ick
16-01-15, 10:19
De strekking is als volgt.
Niemand mag iets doen wat moslims niet leuk vinden. Anders maken ze je dood en is het je eigen schuld want je had beter kunnen en moeten weten ('Stupid'). Je was gewaarschuwd.
Maffiapraktijken.

Waren die spotprenten er niet geweest dan was er wel een andere reden gezocht. Was de aaslag toch gepleegd en was de profeet wel ergens anders beledigd door iets of iemand anders.

Die supermarkt hoor je heel wijselijk niets over. Iedereen beperkt zich tot het beledigen van de profeet maar wat hadden die supermarktmensen gedaan dat ze moesten sterven?