PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : How two-cylinder engines and F1 technology could redefine road cars



super ick
31-03-16, 07:33
How two-cylinder engines and F1 technology could redefine road cars

Formula One technology and very small capacity engines should be the future for road cars, according to Mercedes engine boss Andy Cowell.

The current engine regulations were designed to promote hybrid technologies and since their introduction manufacturers have improved thermal efficiency from 29 percent to more than 45 percent, meaning more than 45 percent of the potential energy in the fuel is delivered to the crankshaft. Cowell believes those efficiency gains will start to filter down to road cars in the near future, allowing family-sized cars to be powered by small capacity, two-cylinder engines.

Asked what drivetrain he would use if he was designing the next generation of Mercedes C-Class, Cowell came up with a proposal quite different to the brand's current offering of straight fours, V6s and V8s.

"If I get the job of the next C-Class and we can get parts for free -- so somebody doesn't pull the cost out of it without destroying the efficiency -- you would definitely go for a very small capacity engine, tiny, maybe half a litre," he said. "It would be less than three cylinders, down at 400cc -- let's start talking about cc and not litres. So a 400cc, 90-degree, v-twin with 200bhp!"

Cowell's idea of a two-cylinder engine would also be turbocharged much like the current F1 engines, with an F1-style MGU-H to control turbine speeds in order to combat turbo lag. Independent MGU-Ks would also be fitted on the front wheels to harvest energy under braking and provide four wheel drive when necessary under acceleration.

"I hate brake discs getting warm on any vehicle, so it's probably having an electric machine at the front two corners if we are staying rear-wheel drive for a nice driving experience. So one electric machine on the powertrain, two electric machines on the front that have got enough power to absorb over half a G braking.

"You would have a miniaturised version of the F1 assembly to recover energy from the turbine and you would use that when you really want to get away from the traffic lights. So you'd have the front drive motors, four-wheel drive, you'd have the engine pulling you away and then when you want to do your zero emissions around town, you would have used the engine in the suburbs to make sure the battery is full.

"You need a decent battery, efficient power electronics and then it's a question of how much would the engine actually be doing? At that point is it not just a range extender? Is it not that the C-Class has a 400cc, v-twin range extender that sits there and operates at full throttle with around 54% thermal efficiency?"

The MGU-K on an F1 car controls the turbine speed for optimum boost pressure, with any excess energy either harvested and stored in the battery or delivered straight to the crank shaft via the ERS. The biggest difference with an F1 power unit and a road car is the way the driver demands power, as a road car is unlikely to be driven at full throttle on the straights with heavy braking in the corners. Cowell said that would have to be considered on the road car engine design.

"It's the drive cycle aspect of whether the electric machine recovering from the turbine is of merit, because how many of us drive our road cars at full throttle? Not many. And even if we do, it's only for a few seconds. The electric turbo recovering from the turbine needs full throttle, which is then where you are getting into the electric machine doing even more."

Despite a trend for electric cars in recent years, Cowell sees hybrid gasoline engines as the future for journeys outside of cities.




"I think there is a beautiful partnership between high-voltage hybrid systems and internal combustion engines, where they can help each other," he explained. "There is a huge problem with the mass of batteries in pure electric vehicles. Cars need to have low aerodynamic loses and be lightweight [to be efficient], but as soon as you say 'lightweight' and 'electric vehicle' there is a huge conflict. So what you want is a system that recovers all that kinetic energy and a system that uses gasoline because gasoline has great energy density. But you want an engine that converts that at greater than 50% efficiency to useful work.

"If in the future we are all going to be living in cities and close together, then electric cars are fine. But we need to make sure that the electricity comes from an honourable source -- it's very important that we keep an eye on that. What comes out of our three-pin [wall] socket hasn't necessarily come from a great source.

"If it's coming from solar panels on all the buildings then fine, but if it's coming from coal-fired power stations or gas turbines, I don't think it's that honourable. In cities an EV [electric vehicle] with zero emissions is perfect, but as soon as we start doing say 100km or maybe even 80km -- not a big number -- then a hybrid makes more sense."
How two-cylinder engines and F1 technology could redefine road cars (http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/15097284/how-two-cylinder-engines-f1-technology-redefine-road-cars)

Als overgang naar..........?

mark61
31-03-16, 20:41
Ik heb al een 3 cilinder turbo 900cc bak 90pk. Trekt prima op. Misschien moet Mercedes niet van die zware tanks maken :slaap:

Hij kletst overigens over 'honourable'. Zelfs als stroom van kolencentrales komt is een elektrische auto milieuvriendelijker. Nog afgezien van het feit dat de vervuiling dan uit bewoonde gebieden wordt verwijderd, maar dat helpt natuurlijk niet tegen vervuiling van de hele wereld. Wel voor de volksgezondheid.

Wat bedoelt ie met een electric machine?

Ik denk trouwens dat ie te laat is. De ontwikkelingen in 100% elektrisch gaan razendsnel.

Het is gewoon een conservatief die niet van benzine af wil, omdat het zo lekker ruikt :hihi:

Soldim
01-04-16, 07:47
Enb, super, wat denk je over de nieuwe Tesla? Ik vind 350 km een beetje weinig... maar ben waarschijnlijk niet de average gebruiker.

super ick
01-04-16, 10:23
Enb, super, wat denk je over de nieuwe Tesla? Ik vind 350 km een beetje weinig... maar ben waarschijnlijk niet de average gebruiker.

Het zou voor 90% van de gebruikers voldoende zijn. Zeker als er een behoorlijk net snelladers beschikbaar is. De meeste mensen gebruiken de auto toch om naar het werk te rijden. 150km heen en 150 km terug zonder op te laden is dus goed mogelijk. Ik denk dat deze afstand sowieso ruim voldoende is. Woon je verder weg dan moet je opladen op het werk maar dit zie je al steeds meer.

Er zullen voorlopig wel brandstofmotoren beschikbaar moeten blijven maar hier is ook best nog veel mogelijk zoals blijkt uit het stukje.

De emotie gaat vlug toeslaan schat ik in. In 2018 komen er drie andere merken met een elektrische auto met een vergelijkbare actieradius. Als het aanbod van dergelijke auto's in de middenklasse eenmaal op gang komt gaat het snel. Leasemaatschappijen zullen toehappen en de inruilwaarde van benzineauto's zal dalen wat mensen aan het denken zet bij de aanschaf van een nieuwe auto.

Behalve geen CO-2 is het onderhoud ook vele malen minder. De enige draaiende delen zijn de wielen en de as van de elektromotor. In potentie kan zo'n auto een levenslang mee. Daarnaast verwacht ik ook dat de batterijen goedkoper zullen gaan worden want massaproductie. Ongetwijfeld komen er leveranciers op de markt die batterijen gaan leveren en bedrijven die ze inbouwen.

Een leuke bijkomstigheid, wat nu al gebeurt bij Tesla, zijn de updates. Regelmatig wordt de software van de auto automatisch geüpdatet net als je Ipad.

mark61
01-04-16, 18:54
Ik hoop wel dat het vertrouwen in Tesla blijft, met 900 miljoen verlies vorig jaar.

Maar er zitten van allerlei investeerders in. En het heeft gewoon toekomst.