PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Hoe Denkt De Derde Wereld Vandaag (24 Jan.) Over Bush En Zijn Oorlog?



Ron Haleber
24-01-03, 10:36
Hier een kort artikel dat de reacties weergeeft van meest Indiase hindoes (uit hun namen op te maken!) over Bush en zijn oorlog met Irak.

Het geeft een aardige indruk hoe er in de derde wereld over Bush gedacht wordt...!



Published on Thursday, January 23, 2003 by the Toronto Star

'Sept. 11 Just a Straw in the Wind'

Asian Intellectuals Vilify 'Cowboyish' Bush by Haroon Siddiqui



MYSORE—This historic city in India has been overshadowed by nearby Bangalore, hub of India's information technology. But this former capital of a regional Hindu empire (1394-1947 but for a 40-year Muslim interregnum) offers greater charms: The exquisite palace of the maharajah, featuring a gilded dome and stained glass ceiling, teak and rosewood doors with silver and ivory inlay, and a bejeweled throne of fig wood; ancient temples in and out of the city; a lush countryside; and past it, up on a hill, British India's famous summer resort of Ooty.

To this city came 230 academics and others for a joint meeting of the Canada-Asia Pacific Conference and the Indian Association for Canadian Studies. I posed two questions to a random sample of delegates: What do you think of George W. Bush? And of a possible war on Iraq?

Herewith some of their responses:

Myung-Bae Yeom: director, American Canadian Institute, Chungnam National University, Daejon, South Korea.

I don't believe a word of what Bush says. He's not as wise as a president of the United States should be. He thinks the cowboyish way. Under him, the world may end up with a one-state tyranny. In our Oriental way of thinking, people of age and power are respected. But they have the wisdom to concede to the young and the weak. The United States does not. That's the core of the world's current conflict with America.

Dr. Harish Narang, professor, English, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

What caused 9/11? Anger at America. The blatant manner in which America is supporting Israel is leading to a counter-movement in the world. More than Israel, it will be America that will pay the price. Sept. 11 was just a straw in the wind.

Just about everybody hates America now, not only Islamists or jihadis or Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. Germany's Gerhard Schroeder won an election opposing an American war on Iraq. Hundreds and thousands of people are protesting in London, Rome and elsewhere for the first time since the Vietnam War. But the lessons of Vietnam seem to have been lost on America.

It has become brash and arrogant: supporting acts of Israeli terror on hapless Palestinians, in total defiance of world opinion; bombing Iraq into the stone age and then forcing millions of innocent Iraqi people to pay either with their lives or by surviving at a subhuman level for the sins of Saddam Hussein; and now it's threatening another war. This is America at its brazen worst, an icon of barbarity. It's a political pariah.

Sunil Sondhi, professor, international relations, Delhi University.

I support George Bush. The currency of international relations is power. The United States is the biggest economic and military power. If the president perceives that Iraq is an emerging threat to his country, he has every right to take a stand. As for his double standards, I believe that any country in that position would do the same.

Amarjeet Singh Narang, professor, social sciences, Indira Gandhi University, New Delhi.

Bush's plan to attack Iraq is not justified, from a humanitarian or international legal point of view. He cannot be the self-appointed policeman of the world when he himself has the maximum number of nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, there is no deterrent to American power. Russia, China and others are looking to improve their economic relations with America. The only possibility of a counterweight is the European Union.

Dr. Jameela Begum, professor, English, University of Kerala, Trivandrum .

I think Bush is another Hitler. He thinks there is only one nation and it must rule the world.

Dr. Vinnay Jain, professor political science, Ambedkar University, Agra.

Originally, I thought that Bush was daft. But his foreign policy, whether it is his own or dictated by his associates, shows maturity even if his pronouncements don't. His rhetoric — "smoke them out of the caves," "fight to the last man," etc. — is very cowboyish. I don't believe a word he says about Saddam Hussein. My students feel the same way. They think Saddam is a hero because they want someone, anyone, to stand up to America.

Dr. Chandra Mohan, president of Indian Association for Canadian Studies.

Bush adopts a soft attitude towards his friends' terrorism but wages war against other forms of terrorism. He has a double standard when it comes to Palestine and when it comes to Iraq. The same allegation applies to his dealings with our country, India, because he is giving monetary assistance to Pakistan (accused of cross-border terrorism in Kashmir).

B. Hariharan, lecturer, English, Mysore University.

Bush is aggressive when he need not be. Power is completely corrupted in his hands. It's painful to watch. What crime have the people of Iraq committed? What have those women and children done? Bush talks about Saddam's violation of human rights but American economic sanctions are the worst form of human rights violation. America is supporting Israel, which is also violating basic human rights. Somewhere along the line, the American soul has been lost.

Dr. Cooni Vevaina, professor, English, University of Mumbai.

Bush is full of banalities. It's very obvious that other people do the thinking for him. On Iraq, it's right-wing and myopic cowboy politics.


Copyright 1996-2003. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited

Ron Haleber
24-01-03, 11:29
Geplaatst door J.M.T.
Hallo Ron

Velen landen denken zoals India.

En wie is India dat er niet van terugdeinst een atoomoorlog aan te gaan met Pakistan?

De intellectuelen daar - als hier - hebben niet dezelfde mening als hun regering...

Toen ik les gaf aan de Nehru en de Gandhi-universiteit in Delhi kon ik dat zelf constateren...

Veel intellectuelen daar baseren zich of op Ghandi of zijn marxistisch...!

mrz
24-01-03, 21:44
Gelukkig zijn er nog landen als Frankrijk en Duitsland die de houding van de intellectuelen delen. Of ook Turkije blijkbaar...


Turkish Leader Calls U.S. Campaign Against Iraq Hypocritical
By Scheherezade Faramarzi Associated Press Writer
Published: Jan 24, 2003

ISTANBUL, Turkey (AP) - Turkey's top politician harshly criticized the United States on Friday, suggesting its drive to disarm Iraq is hypocritical, and said his country would not decide whether to support U.S. military action until the U.N. Security Council weighs in.

Turkey was a key U.S. ally in the 1991 Gulf War and was expected to play a similarly important role in any new war against Saddam Hussein.
Still, Erdogan made the strongest comments yet by a Turkish leader against the U.S. campaign against Iraq. Turkey is under heavy American pressure to allow the use of its bases to attack Iraq, but public opposition to war is strong in the country.

Erdogan, who heads the ruling party and is considered the behind-the-scenes leader of the government, said eliminating nuclear, biological and chemical weapons in Iraq was a worthy goal.

"But let's not kid ourselves," he told reporters at the World Economic Forum in Daovs, Switzerland. "No one is interested in eliminating their own weapons of mass destruction. They're interested in strengthening their own weapons of mass destruction."

Asked if he was accusing the United States of hypocrisy, Erdogan said: "I meant all the countries in the world. The United States is also included."

Murat Mercan, the deputy chairman of Erdogan's party, denied that Erdogan was accusing the United States of "hypocrisy." He said in Ankara that Erdogan told him by phone he was talking generally about all countries.

He also said that Erdogan meant to say countries are not interested in reducing their expenditures on weapons of mass destruction.

He said his government would wait for a U.N. decision before deciding whether to support military action. "The decision which is important for us is the decision of the U.N. Security Council," said Erdogan, who is expected to become prime minister after he runs in parliamentary by-elections in March.

Turkey has long said it would prefer to have U.N. approval for any attack on Iraq, but its top ally, the United States, wants it to allow tens of thousands of American troops to use its bases to open a northern front against Iraq. Washington said it does not need U.N. approval to launch a war.

Turkey has been reluctant to give permission and has reportedly asked Washington to scale down its planned deployment.

Erdogan noted the "major price" Turkey paid after the 1991 Gulf War - a flood of Kurdish refugees, lost lives and economic disruption, which he put at $100 billion. "We do not want to pay the same prices one more time," he said.

British military chief, Adm. Sir Michael Boyce visited Turkey's Incirlik air base - the hub of British and U.S. warplanes enforcing the northern no-fly zone over Iraq. Incirlik is expected to be a key attack base if the United States strikes Iraq again.

Hoping to avert a war, Turkey hosted a gathering this week of foreign minister from Iraq's neighbors and Egypt, who on Thursday urged Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors.

Many observers expect Turkey will eventually bow to U.S. pressure and allow use of the bases. But the government is eager to show the Turkish public it has made an effort to prevent conflict.

Turkish Foreign Minister Yasar Yakis said Friday that allowing U.S. troops to use Turkish soil to launch an attack on Iraq puts military pressure on Saddam to comply with U.N. inspectors.

"The more there is military pressure on Iraq, the more it is likely to reach a peaceful solution," Yakis said.

He was speaking at a joint news conference with his German counterpart Joschka Fischer who is in Turkey as part of German efforts to prevent a war. Fischer said Berlin was also concerned by "the risks" of a U.S. military action.

Fischer praised Thursday's declaration by the foreign ministers of Iran, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt, calling it a "strong message to the Iraqi government that there must be full compliance."

Russia joined Germany and France on Thursday in insisting there was currently no justification for military action against Iraq and urging Washington to wait for arms inspectors to finish their work.

The split over Iraq grew more bitter after U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld offended NATO allies France and Germany this week by calling them part of "old Europe" and "a problem" because of their opposition to military action.

"Cool down, cool down," Fischer said Friday in response to Rumsfeld's comments. "We are good friends, good allies. We have a discussion now about how to deal with Iraq. But cool down."

Fischer is on a tour of the Middle East as part of Germany's effort to find a peaceful solution to the standoff with Iraq. He met with Turkish officials Friday and was continuing on to Egypt and Jordan.

AP-ES-01-24-03 1501EST




http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA52WDKCBD.html