mrz
24-01-03, 15:55
Oud nieuws, maar helaas nog steeds relevant.
Depleted uranium may stop kidneys "in days"
00:01 12 March 02
NewScientist.com news service
Soldiers who inhale or swallow high levels of depleted uranium (DU) on the battlefield could suffer kidney failure within days, according to a new report from the one of the UK's premier scientific bodies, the Royal Society. There are also long term risks for children who play in heavily contaminated areas, it says.
The high density of DU helps shells pierce armour and about 270 tonnes of it have been fired during wars in the Gulf and the Balkans in the last decade. Arguments over the potential risks to human health and the environment have raged ever since.
The Royal Society published a report on the radiological hazards in 2001, which concluded that troops in a tank who survived being hit by a DU shell could double their risk of dying from lung cancer. Now the society's team of 11 experts has produced a second report on the chemical and long-term environmental risks.
It concludes that most soldiers would not take in enough DU to damage their kidneys. But it points out that those in hit tanks, or who spend time cleaning them up, could suffer heavy metal poisoning.
"Kidney uranium levels in some of these soldiers could be very high and would probably lead to kidney failure within a few days of exposure," the report warns. There is also a danger of damage to reproductive health, which has been observed in mice.
Contaminated ground
DU shells in the ground could contaminate the soil, food and water of communities that return to live on the battlefields, the report says. This may be enough to harm local children, particularly if they swallow soil.
But the report is dismissed by anti-DU campaigners who think that the risks are worse that the Royal Society thinks.
"This is an attempt to give a scientific imprimatur to the stance of the government, which is unacceptable," argues Malcolm Hooper, a medical chemist from the University of Sunderland who advises the British Gulf War veterans.
He says it is wrong to separate the chemical and radiological effects. He has been told that three out of the 3000 veterans so far assessed by the UK government's programme have kidney cancer. This is 12 times the rate amongst civilians and indicates that the radiation emitted by DU is causing more problems than its chemical toxicity.
Rob Edwards
Related Stories
Depleted uranium only a radiation risk to soldiers in a worst case scenario
22 May 2001
UN says depleted uranium contamination not widespread in Kosovo
13 March 2001
European fears over depleted uranium prompt crisis talks
9 January 2001
For more related stories
search the print edition Archive
Weblinks
UK Royal Society
Depleted uranium, UK Ministry of Defence
Depleted uranium links, Google
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992024
Depleted uranium may stop kidneys "in days"
00:01 12 March 02
NewScientist.com news service
Soldiers who inhale or swallow high levels of depleted uranium (DU) on the battlefield could suffer kidney failure within days, according to a new report from the one of the UK's premier scientific bodies, the Royal Society. There are also long term risks for children who play in heavily contaminated areas, it says.
The high density of DU helps shells pierce armour and about 270 tonnes of it have been fired during wars in the Gulf and the Balkans in the last decade. Arguments over the potential risks to human health and the environment have raged ever since.
The Royal Society published a report on the radiological hazards in 2001, which concluded that troops in a tank who survived being hit by a DU shell could double their risk of dying from lung cancer. Now the society's team of 11 experts has produced a second report on the chemical and long-term environmental risks.
It concludes that most soldiers would not take in enough DU to damage their kidneys. But it points out that those in hit tanks, or who spend time cleaning them up, could suffer heavy metal poisoning.
"Kidney uranium levels in some of these soldiers could be very high and would probably lead to kidney failure within a few days of exposure," the report warns. There is also a danger of damage to reproductive health, which has been observed in mice.
Contaminated ground
DU shells in the ground could contaminate the soil, food and water of communities that return to live on the battlefields, the report says. This may be enough to harm local children, particularly if they swallow soil.
But the report is dismissed by anti-DU campaigners who think that the risks are worse that the Royal Society thinks.
"This is an attempt to give a scientific imprimatur to the stance of the government, which is unacceptable," argues Malcolm Hooper, a medical chemist from the University of Sunderland who advises the British Gulf War veterans.
He says it is wrong to separate the chemical and radiological effects. He has been told that three out of the 3000 veterans so far assessed by the UK government's programme have kidney cancer. This is 12 times the rate amongst civilians and indicates that the radiation emitted by DU is causing more problems than its chemical toxicity.
Rob Edwards
Related Stories
Depleted uranium only a radiation risk to soldiers in a worst case scenario
22 May 2001
UN says depleted uranium contamination not widespread in Kosovo
13 March 2001
European fears over depleted uranium prompt crisis talks
9 January 2001
For more related stories
search the print edition Archive
Weblinks
UK Royal Society
Depleted uranium, UK Ministry of Defence
Depleted uranium links, Google
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992024