Bahmed
20-03-03, 17:12
Assalaam oe3aleikoem wa rahmatoellaahie wa barakaatoeh moehiebbiena fiellaah jaa ummatoelmoesliemien.
En laka salaam voor de niet-moslims.
Zoals jullie allemaal gezien hebben is de nieuwe aanval op de oemma vannacht begonnen door de hedendaagse Engelse kruisvaarders en haar planners de zionisten. En opnieuw zullen miljoenen van onze broeders in Irak omkomen, van huis en haard vluchten om onderdak te zoeken in vluchtelingenkampen, hongerlijden en in een angst leven die voor ons onvoorstelbaar is zonder dat onze zogenaamde leiders er iets tegen hebben gedaan om het tegen te houden. En dat terwijl zij zelf en dus alle moslims het volgende doelwit zijn. Soebhaanallaah.
Het enige wat wij kunnen doen is huilen om het leed dat ze op dit moment weer wordt aangedaan of voor het Iraakse volk en de vele moejahidien die alhamdoelillaah wel met grote getalen zijn gekomen om de Irakezen te beschermen te bidden. Van 2 raka3aat ga je niet dood. Doe het voor hun als je eigen je nog niks kan schelen.
Ik zal hieronder voor de broeders en zusters die geinteresseerd zijn om het te lezen met behulp van een essay van een lid van de zionistische wereldorganisatie duidelijk maken wat de zionistische staat met deze oorlog te maken heeft. Want er zijn vele partijen die baat hebben bij deze agressie tegen Baghdad, de hoofdstad van ons ooit zo glorierijke umma en tegenwoordig de staat die het grootste gevaar vormt voor de zionistische entiteit. Daarom moet je kijken naar de overlappende belangen. De machtige zionistische lobby in Washington die bestaat uit adviseurs, beleidsmakers, regeringsmededwerkers en CEO’s uit verschillende takken van de financiele en commerciele wereld, waaronder natuurlijk de media en olie-en wapenindustrie, is daar de belangrijkste van.
Voorbeelden zijn teveel om allemaal op te noemen maar dit zijn er een paar:
Henry Kissinger. De man die de vredesbesprekingen met Vietnam ondergraafde waardoor miljoenen Vietnamezen omkwamen bij de Amerikaanse aanval. De man die Nixon adviseerde om Cambodja en Laos te bombarderen. Resultaat: Cambodja 600.000 doden en Laos 400.000 doden. De man die Pinochet hielp bij zijn coup. Enz. Enz.. En nog steeds zie je zijn rotkop op CNN.
De huidige onderminister Wolfowitz. Volgens velen de hardste pleiter voor de aanval op Irak.
Witte huis woordvoerder Ari Fleischer met zijn uitstekende connecties met de door joden gedomineerde Amerikaanse media.
En last but not least de bedenker van de militaire doctrine “shock and awe” die toegepast gaat worden tegen Irak. Harlan Ullman.
Je ziet dus dat de het internationale podium bezet is door een select groepje mensen waarvan de zionisten uit de kleine joodse gemeenschap een onvoorstelbaar belangrijk onderdeel vormen en nu het voortouw hebben genomen bij de aanval op de moslims en het pre-emptive verdedigen van Israel. Waarschijnlijk dat de daarmee samenhangende onvoorwaardelijke steun van de VS aan Israel nu iets duidelijker wordt.
In 1982 the Hebrew-language magazine Kivunim (Directions), the official organ of the World Zionist Organization published an important article entitled, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties". The Editor of Kivunim is Yoram Beck, Head of Publications, Department of Information, of the World Zionist Organization. Also on the Editorial Committee of Kivunim is Amnon Hadary, a member of the Palmach during the 1948 atrocities.
Israel Shahak, professor of organic chemistry at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and chairman of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights translated the article into English and wrote athe following foreword to it. It was published in 1982 as a pamphlet by the Association of Arab-American University graduates. Professor Shahak states:
The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:
1 . The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the îbestî that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq : "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz, 2/6/1982). Actually this aspect of the plan is very old.
2. The strong connection with neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author's notes. But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the îdefense of the Westî from Soviet power, the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after be has deceived all the rest.
Kivunim´ s plan states that all the Arab states are fragmented as follows:
•"The Arab Muslim world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly selfdestructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging. Most of the Arabs, l l 8 million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).
Iraq: Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi'ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.
Israel's plan
by Kivunim :
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ISRAEL TO IMPLEMENT ITS PLAN
• "A sad and very stormy situation surrounds Israel and creates challenges for it, problems, risks but also far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967. Chances are that opportunities missed at that time will become achievable in the Eighties to an extent and along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today. The îpeaceî policy and the return of territories, through a dependence upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us. Since 1967, all the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to narrow political needs, on the one hand, and on the other to destructive opinions at home which neutralized our capacities both at home and abroad. Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories, acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. Today we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade otherwise we shall not survive as a state."
Iraq: Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.
• There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel´s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine co-existence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.
Within Israel the distinction between the areas of '67 and the territories beyond them, those of ´48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of '67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three-fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch. Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic stratcgic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today."
Laat 1 ding dus duidelijk zijn. Dit is slechts het startschot van de aanval en poging tot opsplitsing en verzwakking van de gehele Islamitische oemma naar voordelige zionistische doelstellingen. Nog meer dan nu al het geval is. Want 1 ding is nu wel duidelijk geworden een Palestijnse staat gaat er in 2005 of daarna niet komen als de oemma die niet afdwingt.
De geschiedenis herhaalt zich. Generaal Wilson trapte toen hij Damascus innam tegen het graf van Salahadien al Ayyubi rahimahoellaah en zei word wakker Salahadien de kruisvaarders zijn terug. Dit keer zijn ze niet alleen terug maar zijn ze door de zionisten gestuurd.
Allaahoemma demmier a3daa’a almoesliemien. Wallaahoemma nsar Almoejaahidien fie koellie makaan.
En laka salaam voor de niet-moslims.
Zoals jullie allemaal gezien hebben is de nieuwe aanval op de oemma vannacht begonnen door de hedendaagse Engelse kruisvaarders en haar planners de zionisten. En opnieuw zullen miljoenen van onze broeders in Irak omkomen, van huis en haard vluchten om onderdak te zoeken in vluchtelingenkampen, hongerlijden en in een angst leven die voor ons onvoorstelbaar is zonder dat onze zogenaamde leiders er iets tegen hebben gedaan om het tegen te houden. En dat terwijl zij zelf en dus alle moslims het volgende doelwit zijn. Soebhaanallaah.
Het enige wat wij kunnen doen is huilen om het leed dat ze op dit moment weer wordt aangedaan of voor het Iraakse volk en de vele moejahidien die alhamdoelillaah wel met grote getalen zijn gekomen om de Irakezen te beschermen te bidden. Van 2 raka3aat ga je niet dood. Doe het voor hun als je eigen je nog niks kan schelen.
Ik zal hieronder voor de broeders en zusters die geinteresseerd zijn om het te lezen met behulp van een essay van een lid van de zionistische wereldorganisatie duidelijk maken wat de zionistische staat met deze oorlog te maken heeft. Want er zijn vele partijen die baat hebben bij deze agressie tegen Baghdad, de hoofdstad van ons ooit zo glorierijke umma en tegenwoordig de staat die het grootste gevaar vormt voor de zionistische entiteit. Daarom moet je kijken naar de overlappende belangen. De machtige zionistische lobby in Washington die bestaat uit adviseurs, beleidsmakers, regeringsmededwerkers en CEO’s uit verschillende takken van de financiele en commerciele wereld, waaronder natuurlijk de media en olie-en wapenindustrie, is daar de belangrijkste van.
Voorbeelden zijn teveel om allemaal op te noemen maar dit zijn er een paar:
Henry Kissinger. De man die de vredesbesprekingen met Vietnam ondergraafde waardoor miljoenen Vietnamezen omkwamen bij de Amerikaanse aanval. De man die Nixon adviseerde om Cambodja en Laos te bombarderen. Resultaat: Cambodja 600.000 doden en Laos 400.000 doden. De man die Pinochet hielp bij zijn coup. Enz. Enz.. En nog steeds zie je zijn rotkop op CNN.
De huidige onderminister Wolfowitz. Volgens velen de hardste pleiter voor de aanval op Irak.
Witte huis woordvoerder Ari Fleischer met zijn uitstekende connecties met de door joden gedomineerde Amerikaanse media.
En last but not least de bedenker van de militaire doctrine “shock and awe” die toegepast gaat worden tegen Irak. Harlan Ullman.
Je ziet dus dat de het internationale podium bezet is door een select groepje mensen waarvan de zionisten uit de kleine joodse gemeenschap een onvoorstelbaar belangrijk onderdeel vormen en nu het voortouw hebben genomen bij de aanval op de moslims en het pre-emptive verdedigen van Israel. Waarschijnlijk dat de daarmee samenhangende onvoorwaardelijke steun van de VS aan Israel nu iets duidelijker wordt.
In 1982 the Hebrew-language magazine Kivunim (Directions), the official organ of the World Zionist Organization published an important article entitled, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties". The Editor of Kivunim is Yoram Beck, Head of Publications, Department of Information, of the World Zionist Organization. Also on the Editorial Committee of Kivunim is Amnon Hadary, a member of the Palmach during the 1948 atrocities.
Israel Shahak, professor of organic chemistry at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and chairman of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights translated the article into English and wrote athe following foreword to it. It was published in 1982 as a pamphlet by the Association of Arab-American University graduates. Professor Shahak states:
The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:
1 . The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the îbestî that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq : "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz, 2/6/1982). Actually this aspect of the plan is very old.
2. The strong connection with neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author's notes. But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the îdefense of the Westî from Soviet power, the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after be has deceived all the rest.
Kivunim´ s plan states that all the Arab states are fragmented as follows:
•"The Arab Muslim world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly selfdestructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging. Most of the Arabs, l l 8 million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).
Iraq: Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi'ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.
Israel's plan
by Kivunim :
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ISRAEL TO IMPLEMENT ITS PLAN
• "A sad and very stormy situation surrounds Israel and creates challenges for it, problems, risks but also far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967. Chances are that opportunities missed at that time will become achievable in the Eighties to an extent and along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today. The îpeaceî policy and the return of territories, through a dependence upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us. Since 1967, all the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to narrow political needs, on the one hand, and on the other to destructive opinions at home which neutralized our capacities both at home and abroad. Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories, acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. Today we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade otherwise we shall not survive as a state."
Iraq: Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.
• There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel´s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine co-existence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.
Within Israel the distinction between the areas of '67 and the territories beyond them, those of ´48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of '67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three-fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch. Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic stratcgic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today."
Laat 1 ding dus duidelijk zijn. Dit is slechts het startschot van de aanval en poging tot opsplitsing en verzwakking van de gehele Islamitische oemma naar voordelige zionistische doelstellingen. Nog meer dan nu al het geval is. Want 1 ding is nu wel duidelijk geworden een Palestijnse staat gaat er in 2005 of daarna niet komen als de oemma die niet afdwingt.
De geschiedenis herhaalt zich. Generaal Wilson trapte toen hij Damascus innam tegen het graf van Salahadien al Ayyubi rahimahoellaah en zei word wakker Salahadien de kruisvaarders zijn terug. Dit keer zijn ze niet alleen terug maar zijn ze door de zionisten gestuurd.
Allaahoemma demmier a3daa’a almoesliemien. Wallaahoemma nsar Almoejaahidien fie koellie makaan.