Bekijk Volledige Versie : The FED - Instrument van de Masonic Society (New World Order)?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
by William Cooper
Below is quote from Representative Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency for 12 years as quoted from the Congressional Record
The Federal Reserve Board, ..., has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt...Our people's money to the extend of $1,200,000,000 has within the last few months been shipped abroad to redeem Federal Reserve Notes and to pay other gambling debts of the traitorous Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks...............
SUMMARY OF QUICK FACTS.
1. The Federal Reserve (FED) is a PRIVATELY OWNED organization. Is this unbelievable? Check the ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA.
Below is the list of the owners of the 12 Central Banks:
- Rothschild Bank of London
- Rothschild Bank of Berlin
- Lazard Brothers of Paris
- Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
- Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
- Warburg Bank of Hamburg
- Lehman Brothers of New York
- Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
- Goldman, Schs of New York
- Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
In all, there are about 300 VERY POWERFUL, partly foreign individuals that own the FED.
2. Although the FED is required to give back most of its PROFITS back to the Treasury Dept., there is NO ORGANIZATION that has the power to AUDIT the FED (not even the Congress or the IRS). This creates a HUGE opportunity for "creative accounting" to hide the profit that ROBS the US Tax Payers Hundreds of Billions of Dollars annually.
3. Every year, a few Congressmen introduced a legislation to AUDIT the FED, and every year, the legislation is defeated. The owners of the FED are the most powerful, invisible lobbying power there is.
4. The owners of the FED own the controlling interests in ALL major media in the US. Rockefeller, through Chase Manhattan bank, controls CBS and ABC and 28 other broadcasting firms. Each of the other owners of the FED also has controlling interest in the US media. This explains why the media have been silent about the FED scam. The FED fraud is the biggest and longest cover-up in the US today.
5. According to Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the US Congress has the power to print money (The Congress shall have the power......to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin...). According to the Supreme Court, the Congress can not transfer its power to other organization like the FED.
HISTORY OF THE FED
After several attempts to push the Federal Reserve Banking Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson's campaign for President. In 1913, Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather to the Rockefellers, pushed the Federal Reserve Act through Congress just before Christmas, when most Congressmen were on vacation. Naturally, President Wilson passed the Act when he was elected as a pay back to the bankers.
HOW THE OWNERS OF THE FED PROFIT AT OUR EXPENSE
The US government runs a $400 billion deficit annually. To cover this, the US government issues bonds which are bought by the FED.
Since the FED has the POWER TO PRINT MONEY, it can buy any amount of the US Government bonds at almost NO COST, save for the expense of printing money (~3 cents/$100).
At this point, the owners of the FED already profit $99.97 for every 3c they invested to print the money. Basically, they exchange something that costs almost nothing to them with the US Government Bonds.
Since the FED can NOT be AUDITED by the IRS (or even by Congress), most of this profit can go anywhere the FED owners want to. BTW, did I mention that the profit is TAX-FREE?
After buying the bonds, the owner of the FED can either:
1. Keep the bonds, and collect the interest the US Government now OWES them.
2. Sell the bonds to the US Tax Payers or foreigners.
In either case, the FED owners have profited $99.97 for every 3 cents it invested to print the money. Remember, the FED is a PRIVATELY OWNED corporation, just like the Federal Express. The profit of the FED goes to the FED owners.
The US Government now owes the FED owners the interest on those bonds.
Remember that the FED owners DO NOT EARN the bonds. They simply PRINT the money to buy the bonds. In other words, they created money out of thin air, and exchange it for the interest bearing bonds.
In order to pay for the bonds' interest, the US Government taxes the US population.
When a US Citizen holding US Government bonds receives his/her return of investment on the bonds, essentially the money he/she receives is the tax money he/she is paying to the Government.
When the OWNERS of the FED receives the interest on the BONDS they're holding, they are receiving that money for FREE (save the initial 3cent/$100 investment to print the money)! Not only that, at the end the FED owners receive the money TAX FREE.
Under the LAW, the FED is REQUIRED to RETURN its PROFIT back to the US Treasury. However, NEITHER the Congress NOR the IRS has the POWER to AUDIT the FED. The FED has used this obvious loophole to profit via 'creative accounting'.
Consider this: every year, the FED profits by hundreds of billions of dollars by buying US Government Bonds. Yet it only returns ~$20 billion to the US Treasury. The rest of the profit has been spent as "Operational Expenses".
The FED expects us to believe that the FED operational expenses amount to $100's billion dollars annually!!!
The truth is, those profits were spent as "DIVIDENDS TO SHAREHOLDERS"!!!!
Year after year, the FED owners bleed the US Tax Payer dry by hundreds of billions of dollars. Keep this going, and the US will go bankrupt in a few more years. Small wonder why the National Debt is increasing at its current rate.
WHY THE FED SHOULD BE ABOLISHED
1. The US Congress has the option to buy back the FED at $450 millions (per Congressional Records). When the Congress does this, it will own back the billions of US
Government Bonds held by the FED. The US Government will actually PROFIT by buying back the FED! Also, the US government no longer has to pay interests to the FED owners on those bonds.
2. Through their ownerships in the FED, FOREIGN POWERS CAN and WILL influence the US economy. By controlling our interest rates and money supply, they can actually create economic disaster in the US, should the US disagree with them.
3. Although the FED directors must be confirmed by the Senate, the awesome lobbying power of the FED owners makes this process meaningless. The owners of the FED can and will put whoever they wish in the position.
4. Abolishing the FED will lead to lower inflation. At this moment, the FED prints as much money as needed to buy the US Government Bonds. Since the FED prints this MONEY out of THIN AIR, this leads to an INCREASE of MONEY SUPPLY, WITHOUT increase in GOODS and SERVICES. This, as all of us know it, leads to INFLATION.
If the general public buys those bonds with money that they EARNED by providing GOODS/SERVICES, the money supply level is in constant relation to the goods/services level. Thus, there is no inflationary pressure from selling these bonds.
5. Abolishing the FED will reduce the national debt level. By buying back the FED at $450 millions, the US Government will buy back the billions of dollars of bonds held by the FED. Thus, the net effect is a reduction in national debt. After buying back
the FED, the US Government does not have to pay interest on those bonds it buys back, further reducing the national debt.
6. Abolishing the FED will lead to eventual balance budget. Today, even if the US Economy only grows by a meager 2%/yr, the US Government should be able to put 2% of US-GDP dollars into circulation WITHOUT INFLATION.
Consider, if the goods/services grow by 2% and the money supply grows by 2%, the ratio of goods/services vs. money supply remains constant. Thus, no inflation is created.
The government can use this extra money supply to fund its project without raising taxes.
As long as the government does not print money more than the goods and services available in the US, there will be no inflationary pressures.
This had in fact been done with Executive Order 11110 of President Kennedy. Kennedy ordered the Treasury Dept. to print a US GOVERNMENT NOTES (vs. FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES). In effect, Kennedy bypassed the FED by making the Treasury Department printed REAL US MONEY, instead of selling bonds to the FED for almost free.
The sad fact is, the US Government does not do this anymore. Instead, the US Government sells bonds to the FED, which buys those bonds using money they don't earn. Thus, the US Government must now pay interest on that money that it "borrows" from the FED.
7. By point (6) above, the US Government can actually reduce taxes on everybody since it has more interest free money to spend in the amount equal to the growth of the US GDP. KEEP IN MIND, THIS MONEY WILL NOT CAUSE INFLATION, since the money is printed along with the growth of the goods and services.
Recently media and legal circles within the United States have been showing signs of paranoia and deliberate misunderstandings of the Muslim communities throughout the United States. There has always been something like an in-built bias against Muslims and Arabs and Palestinians in American culture. One of the best barometers of this American skewed vision of Muslims is Hollywood and the entertainment industry. The average American has been fed a continuous staple of Arabs and Muslims who are centered around their lusts or who can never catch up with the "real world." To this end the motion picture industry has produced the "camel-jockey," "Ahab the Arab," and the seductive "haram." All these years and generations of anti-Arab stereotypes have yielded a more sinister and a more lethal Arab: the "terrorist." And now the Arab terrorist is no longer a Hollywood pass-time. Now the Arab terrorist is the "business" of the highest governmental departments in the country: the executive, the judiciary, and the legislative. But how did all this distaste and aversion for the comical and vulgar Arab turn into raw hatred and military hostilities recently? Why has the official American policy of war against terrorism become in fact and in practice something like an all-out war against Muslims and peoples of the Islamic faith?
To answer this question we would have to go back to the nature of the "Israeli-Arab" conflict. Nothing so defines the image and the status of Muslims and Arabs in the United States and in the West for that matter more than the ups and downs of the Israeli-Arab dispute. This is demonstrated by the case of Egypt. When Egypt, under the leadership of president Jamal 'Abd al-Nasir, was in a belligerent position vis-…-vis Israel Egypt itself was perceived by the American public as a country unworthy of respect or equal treatment. But when Egypt entered into a capitulation position with Israel during the time of president Muhammad Anwar al-Sadat, all of a sudden, Egypt became a country worthy of diplomatic status and of Middle-Eastern fame! On a larger scale, this is what is happening to the Arab and Muslim populations in the West. But the question is still around: why are Muslims, by and large, considered nowadays by the media outlets as well as official personages to be "terrorists" or "would-be terrorists" or "latent terrorists" or "potential terrorists"?
1st To answer this question we would have to go back to the feud in the Middle East between Israelis who come from a Jewish current of history and Arabs who come from an Islamic current of history. As much as there are secular minds that want to isolate the incidents between Arabs and Israelis away from their religious context, the fact of the matter is that the more we proceed into the future with an increasing and intensifying magnitude of clashes and violence, the more we realize that these bloody exchanges between the two opposing blocs (Israelis and Arabs) are extracted from the respective context of each one's religious depths. This should not be hailed as a scientific discovery that has been the undisclosed enigma of the Middle Eastern problem. The fact of the matter is that the veneer of secularism that has shrouded the discourse on Middle Eastern politics for the past century or so has stupefied and confused this core and parallel element on both sides of the issue. And no one can deny that in the last twenty to thirty years there has been an exponential growth and expansion of Islamic self-assertion throughout the whole Middle East. This Islamic re-affirmation includes within its many expressions the political and ideological as well as the military articulation of the majority Muslim people living in that Holy part of the world, and beyond. Obvious the first to feel the effects of this Islamic revival of collective will and social-self are the Israelis who are surrounded from all directions by a sea of Islamic populations. For this reason --- and not for this reason alone --- we notice that the first Western comments on this Islamic self-determination comes from Israeli pundits, commentators, and government officials. And because of the intimate relationship between the United States and Israel the internal Israeli concern for security quickly becomes an internal American concern for security. It need not be that way; but the osmosis of Zionism into Imperialism has rendered many an observer of the American and Israeli societies confused as to whom wags the other: is it the American government that wags the Israeli tail or is it the Israeli government that wags the American tail? But this is another subject to be deferred to the future where the level of events will finally expose the true nature of the deadly political embrace between the Zionist officials in Tel Aviv and their counterparts in Washington.
Het leukste vond ik, wie roert nu zijn staart op commando van wie, is het Israel op commando van de VS of de VS op commando van Israel...
The on-again off-again war between Israelis and Arabs is bound to have its unruly and refractory effect within the corridors of power in Washington, D.C. and throughout the West; but particularly in America. And the symptoms could not be more pronounced. Leading the battle against the Muslims in the United States are hard core Zionist Americans. The Zionist American infrastructure is well established and well organized. AIPAC is a seven hundred pound gorilla that swings its weight between the White House and Capitol Hill. It does not miss a branch or a bough around the Capitol Mall between these two positions. This American Jewish lobby has not had a word of sympathy expressed towards Islamic causes anywhere in the world. This American-Jewish lobby is reinforced by a network of American Jewish civic and religious activities ranging from affiliates of the ACLU to members of Christian evangelical churches throughout the land. With this background it is no surprise to note that the first verbal shots against American civic activity coming from American Muslims was fired by a Yossef Bodansky, an naturalized American who was/is an Israeli citizen. [Yossef Bodansky is described by a Swedish expert on terrorism, Mr. Magnus Rhunstorp, as being unreliable and should be considered the equivalent of an isolated iceman living in the middle of nowhere. About Bodansky's information, this Swedish expert added that it is drivel and lacks credibility --- source: Sidsfinka newspaper, 2-2-2002] Mr. Bodansky wrote a book entitled: Target America: Terrorism in the U.S. Today. What may have given his book a guise or respectability was the fact that Mr. Bodansky was the director of the House Republican Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare. In this book of fixation and mania Islamic organizations and associations such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim Students' Association (MSA), the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA), the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) among other Islamic religious and social organizations were suspect and even fronts in an Islamic Internationale that is out to get Israel. While McCarthy was seeing red behind every shady object, Bodansky was seeing green. Annual conferences and occasional meetings held by these Islamic organizations at which distinguished scholars and speakers were discussing religious, cultural, and social issues --- these conferences in the eyes of Bodansky and his likes were conspiratorial, subversive, and of course anti-Israel! To add octane to Bodansky's alarmist presentations the chairman of the House Republican Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, Bill McCollum of Florida, continued to support Bodansky and even wrote an introduction to his book.
As a sequel to Bodansky's Target America: Terrorism in the U.S. Today and a couple of years afterwards another panicky figure comes along and produces an American prime-time presentation: Jihad in America. [Frontline, 1994]. This new alarmist is Steven Emerson. Emerson's bottom line is that there are Islamic fundamentalists and terrorists who are already settled and situated in the United States with their families and their professional jobs, who are waiting for the signal to go on behalf of the Islamic Internationale and bomb and kill where-ever and when-ever the call of duty arises! In the glow of his TV special Jihad in America and in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing Emerson was approached by the media for his professional opinion as an expert on terrorism about this horrible explosion; and he said that it had the print of Islamic or Middle Eastern terrorism all over it! Of course it turned out that it was Timothy McVeigh who was behind this terrible event, and Mr. Emerson withdrew into his Investigative Project shell and wait for the propitious moment when he would re-emerge with a bang.
In the mean time a profile was readied and an argument was stitched together to convince the American public that the "Muslims are coming." In January 1993, Mir Aimal Kansi shot five employees of the CIA in Langley, Va. Killing two of them. Chalk that up as the first suggestion that Muslims do have an impulse to kill American officials, or something along these lines.
In February of the same year, an explosion goes off at the World Trade Center in New York city in which six people were killed and scores of others were injured. Four Muslims were held responsible for this atrocious act while 118 others were marked as potential un-indicted co-conspirators. Mark this as another incremental implication that Muslims are out to get the United States! In June 1993, the Muslim scholar Sheikh 'Umar 'Abd al-Rahman and nine others from within his "inner circle" were arrested. They were charged with a plot to bomb the United Nations, the George Washington Bridge, the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels as well as a federal office building. Add this plot to the "grand Islamic strategy" of terrorizing the US. In March 1994, some Lebanese opens fire on a bus carrying fifteen Hasidic Jews on the Brooklyn Bridge, and this too is tagged to the "Islamic profile." In February 1997 opens fire at the Empire State building. One tourist is killed and six others wounded before he turns the pistol and kills himself. This, too, helps makes the case that Muslims are methodically targeting Americans! In July 1997, an Arab was arrested by New York City police. They said that he was planning to bomb the subway system. And once again anything that combines an Arab with criminal activity or potential criminal activity is added to the list to make the case that the Muslims are terrorists. Then came proof positive: on September 11, 2001 the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the plane that crashed in rural Pennsylvania, these were all strung together to build a solid case for the Israeli argument that the Muslims are at war with the United States. Nearly three thousand Americans died on this villainous day. And Steven Emerson and his ilk were reborn and re-positioned in front of the world-wide TV and media broadcasts to make their claims that there is an Islamic Terroristic Internationale. Bodansky, Emerson, and company were resurrected from the ashes of ground zero. The media cannot get enough of them. Many times Emerson and his tutors and counselors are filling the air-waves. With a touch of magic Emerson may appear on three different and separate TV programs at the same time.
And now Mr. Emerson comes out with his new book American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us. Recent information from Steven Emerson also indicates that he is pushing for another TV special to further alienate the American Muslims. The title of this new Emerson project is What Went Wrong? (The Birth of Jihad and the War to Destroy America and the West.) What goes unnoticed in this sequence of events is that the effort to demonize Muslims in the United States and the West is proportionately related to the mounting military and psychological pressure exerted by Islamic freedom-fighter movements such as Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and Hizbullah. When these Islamic militias turn the pressure up on the Israeli officials in occupied Palestine, the surrogates of these Israeli officials throughout the Western world and in particular within the United States begin to try to pressure Muslims by such things as movies, books, "documentaries," tampering with the US legal system, and federal and law enforcement raids into Muslim owned businesses and institutions, as well as into Muslim homes! It would seem like the strategy of Emerson and his equivalents is to whip up an air of Islamophobia by which they hope to de-humanize Muslims as a means to discrediting Muslims from any significant or noteworthy participation in the American political process.
Emerson is no Archimedes who happened to stumble across "Islamic Fundamentalism" while he was bored one day in Oklahoma City, as he asserts in his book American Jihad. Emerson did not shout "Eureka" when he began hearing in Muslim conferences the depth of Israeli injustice that is reflected in the lectures and words of Muslim scholars. It is no secret that Muslims the world over feel a deep sense of obligation to liberate the Holy Land from political Zionism and its racist Israeli nation-state. Rather, Mr. Emerson stumbled upon the time-coordinates of the intensification of the anti-Israeli Islamic Jihad on one side of the world and the Zionist felt necessity to recruit the United States of America into an Israeli military campaign against this Islamic anti-Zionist drive.
All of this dovetails very well with the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's declared war on international Islamic terrorism. After the first Palestinian Intifadah (1987- early 90's) and a wave of what the Israelis call "suicide bombings" and the Muslims call "martyrdom operations" the high ranking Israeli officials were convinced that they could not take the steam out of this Palestinian military opposition except by tracking down and eliminating the operational masterminds of what they have been systematically calling the "Islamic terror web." While Rabin and company were encircling the military leaders of the Palestinian people and targeting them with assassination operations and booby-trap detonations, Emerson and company were busy spinning their stories about an international Islamic support system for this Islamic terror.
We should point out that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in militarily occupied Palestine and the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith (ADL) in politically occupied America were working hand in hand. The grand scheme comes from the Zionist minds of the Israeli establishment: a four pronged approach: 1) demanding increased cooperation from Yasser 'Arafat's Palestinian Authority; 2) planning an erection of a massive security fence in the West Bank to keep Palestinians and Israelis apart; 3) boosting intelligence gathering efforts inside Gaza and the West Bank, with extra funds and manpower allocated; and 4) cracking down on known activists and on Hamas and Islamic Jihad-linked institutions...
In this grand Israeli strategy of taking on the Islamic "enemy" every effort had to be exhausted to have the United States on the Israeli military side. It was not enough for the Israelis to have the United States protect them with their vetoes at the United Nations; it was not enough for the Israelis to have the US government locked into a strategic military pact with the government in Tel Aviv; and it was not enough to have the US routinely unload its sophisticated military hardware at Israeli military and civilian airports in occupied Palestine. The Israeli leadership of Rabin, Perez, Netanyahu, Barak, and now Sharon, they all require the United States government to be in the Israeli front line locking up, taking out, and knocking off every Muslim who may eventually become an active opponent of Zionist Israel. Noteworthy in this regard is the continuous feedback that American intelligence (especially the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)) receives from Israeli intelligence. Israeli Intelligence services are reported to have been streamlining classified information to the FBI about Islamic organizations in the United States that gives these organizations a terrorist twist. Mossad, Shin Beth, and Shabak channel their information to the American intelligence agencies to have the latter believe that Islamic organizations operating within the US are either an extension of or support groups for Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the West Bank and Gaza. It was along these "intelligence feed" (American intelligence agencies and federal government departments being baited by Israeli intelligence) that the United States government began to turn its legal and official wrath against American Islamic organizations. To this end, the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development among many other Islamic charity organizations were virtually raided and shut down by the Federal Authorities. Its assets were frozen; and in effect it was rendered inoperable.
With Yossef Bodansky, Judith Miller, and Steven Emerson leading the charge against the Muslims in the media, and with Daniel Pipes, Martin Kramer, and Bernard Lewis concocting and thinking up anti-Semitic (or anti-Arab) ideas in academia, and with the likes of Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz strategizing a "war on terrorism" the Israeli jigsaw puzzle is coming together.
If the United States government wants to approach the issue of terrorism without showing favoritism to American Jews then it should also lock up suspected Jews on the same basis of "secret evidence" and "national security" unless of course there is no longer any difference between American national security and Israeli national security. Even by the standards of the American Department of State there are two or three Israeli Terrorist Organization: Kach, Kahane Chai, and The Jewish Defense League (JDL). And if this is the case why haven't we heard of the FBI, the IRS, the INS, the Secret Service, and other federal law enforcement agencies looking into the finances of these Israeli Zionist terrorist organizations? These pro-Israel Zionist organizations also have a list of committing or attempting to commit crimes on US soil against Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims most of whom are Americans? Are there American Jewish equivalents of the Muslim World League, the Fiqh Council of North America, the Graduate School of Islamic Social Sciences, the International Institute of Islamic Thought, and others that may be considered by reasonable people to be a support system or an "infrastructure" for terrorists who support the racist policies of the apartheid regime in Tel Aviv?
Why doesn't the Justice Department seek to conduct voluntary interviews with 5,000 predominantly Jewish, foreign nationals who are conceivably violent supporters of the Zionist officials in Tel Aviv?
Singling out American Muslims without considering their American Jewish counterparts in the extended Arab-Israeli conflict is unmistakably prejudicial and damaging to the civic fabric of American society.
For starters, may the American Muslims respectfully ask Secretary of Justice Ashcroft to find out which Yeshivas, Synagogues, and Jewish philanthropic organizations have any links to Jewish fundamentalists and "terrorists" and raid their offices and homes? Or would Mr. Ashcroft and the whole American Republican administration of Mr. Bush be afraid of being called "anti-Semitic?"
No thanks, but due to the Israel-firsters in high places and influential offices in subsequent American administrations the Israeli war generals and the American prosecutors have discovered that they have a common enemy: Palestinian Muslims and American Muslims and every Muslim in-between! The Israeli Zionist crowd is riding roughshod over the American legal process and the American Muslims have become the scapegoats for the political lack of progress in solving the Israeli-Arab conflict!
Conclusion
It appears from the sequence of events placed in their proper national and international context that the Zionist crowd and their cheer-leaders have two basic things on their mind. First, they want to equate an international war on terrorism with a particular war on Palestinians. For this reason they keep on reminding us that Yasser 'Arafat is the Palestinians Bin Laden and Ariel Sharon is George Bush. According to this biased reasoning the war against Palestinians is necessarily a war against international terrorism; and divergently the war against international terrorism is ipso facto a war against the Palestinians. Within this reckoning the US government should have all the right in the world to harass, pursue, indict, imprison, deport, and even bring back the assassins to finish off those who are deemed outside a court of law as being with the "terrorists." Because as president Bush said in so many words: if you are not with us, you are against us. Could the following months and years interpret that to mean that if you are not a Zionist you are a "terrorist?"
Second, the Zionist drive is on to diminish and destroy American Muslim organizations that have been working they way up on the American political ladder and making headway as far as American foreign policy is concern. The Zionist lobby was feeling the beginning of the competition with those who do not agree with it --- more specifically with the pro-Palestinian grassroots and lobbying efforts so, now, they are out to get them. The Zionist have recruited the American government to their side. President Bush has been saying all along that the war against terrorism is not a war against Islam; these admirable words are contradicted by actions on the ground. The descending of law enforcement agencies and the frequent violation of legal immigrants and American Muslims' legal rights (contrary to time-honored American values and principles) is proof that the spillover effect of the Middle East problems are beginning to inundate the lives of millions of decent and law-abiding Americans: of Muslim, Arab, Palestinian and other origins. To this end, the United States is being contaminated with the vices of the Zionist interest by virtue of its Zionist lobby. It is high time for the decision makers in Washington to realize that American interests have been hijacked by Israel; and if corrective action is not taken soon enough it will become impossible to distinguish between the American interest and the Israeli interest. Or in the words of Dr. Maher Hathout, Senior Advisor of Muslim Political Affairs Council (MPAC),: "the United States has become the most hated country in the world, competing sometimes with Israel." (Addressing a Capitol Hill audience, April 5, 2002.)
Heb jullie hier geen mening over ZIONISTEN? Of zwijgen jullie liever...
Wie zwijgt stemt toe....zeggen zo ook wel eens...
Voor degenen die het Engels niet zo machtig zijn in een notedop...:
De FED (Federal Reserve Bank), je weet wel die bank die een onuitputtelijke bron van cash lijkt te hebben en die iedere keer landen dwingt to het uitvoeren van een bepaald beleid is tot mijn verbazing een particuliere instutie waarvan dit een lijst van de eigenaren is:
- Rothschild Bank of London
- Rothschild Bank of Berlin
- Lazard Brothers of Paris
- Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
- Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
- Warburg Bank of Hamburg
- Lehman Brothers of New York
- Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
- Goldman, Schs of New York
- Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Er zijn een stuk of 300 zeer invloedrijke mensen die hier de touwtjes goed in handen hebben.
De FED heeft zich op een of andere manier het voorrecht toegeeigent om geld te mogen drukken in de VS. Wanneer de VS in geldnood verkeert dan geeft de VS obligaties uit. De FED koopt deze op. Hoe doet de FED, eigenlijk zeer simpel. Ze drukken gewoon het geld wat ze nodig hebben: het kost $0.03 cent om $100 dollar te drukken. Een deel wordt in de markt verkocht en een deel houdt men zelf. De winst die men maakt is dus $99.97 cent. De VS moet de FED wel rente betalen voor de dienst van de FED: "Het drukken van dollars voor 3 cent per $100 dollar". De VS betaalt de FED door belasting te heffen op de "normale VS burger". Dus de FED krijgt echt geld voor het drukken van papier. De regel is dat de FED een deel van de winst moet uitbetalen aan de federale overheid. Echter de FED hoeft geen boekhouding te overhandigen aan de federale overheid. Verschillende pogingen daartoe zijn gestrand omdat de FED met haar macht dat altijd heeft weten tegen te houden. Dus de FED keert een schijntje uit aan de federale overheid van wat zij naar het buitenland (aandeelhouders etc. exporteert).
M.A.W. de VS is een MELKKOE voor een groep mensen die het land leegplunderen zolang het gaat.... Ondertussen raakt de VS steeds verder in de schulden...en straks zijn de pensioenen van al die arme belastingbetalers geen rooie cent waard tegen de tijd dat iedereen wakker wordt en de VS bankroet is.....
De parasieten ... c.q. ...... kakkerlakken....dat verklaart ook de onuitputtelijk lijkende bron van geld....
de FED is almachtig :blowen:
ze weten het spel superslim te spelen
Geplaatst door Arvid
de FED is almachtig :blowen:
ze weten het spel superslim te spelen
Ik vind dat er een spoeddebat moeten komen over dit grotesk economisch delict... Dit heeft gevolgen die niemand kan overzien. Het gaat ons allemaal aan. Niemand is zijn oude dag zeker wanneer het zaakje als een plumpudding in elkaar zakt zoals ENRON en WORLDCOM. Dat had ook niemand voor mogelijk gehouden.
Niemand wil een Argentinie op grote schaal....
Geplaatst door Wizdom
Ik vind dat er een spoeddebat moeten komen over dit grotesk economisch delict... Dit heeft gevolgen die niemand kan overzien. Het gaat ons allemaal aan. Niemand is zijn oude dag zeker wanneer het zaakje als een plumpudding in elkaar zakt zoals ENRON en WORLDCOM. Dat had ook niemand voor mogelijk gehouden.
Niemand wil een Argentinie op grote schaal....
:regie: Donna waar ben je......
Geplaatst door Wizdom
Ik vind dat er een spoeddebat moeten komen over dit grotesk economisch delict... Dit heeft gevolgen die niemand kan overzien. Het gaat ons allemaal aan. Niemand is zijn oude dag zeker wanneer het zaakje als een plumpudding in elkaar zakt zoals ENRON en WORLDCOM. Dat had ook niemand voor mogelijk gehouden.
Niemand wil een Argentinie op grote schaal....
De Koersen in de VS worden op dit moment al kunstmatig hoog gehouden. De FED is bezig met het opkopen van aandelen om de koers te stabiliseren. De huidige koersen op de Amerikaanse markt zijn te hoog, dus er zal een flinke koers correctie komen, waarschijnlijk in Oktober. Of we daarmee ook meteen Argentinie op grote schaal krijgen... wie zal het zeggen.
Geplaatst door lennart
De Koersen in de VS worden op dit moment al kunstmatig hoog gehouden. De FED is bezig met het opkopen van aandelen om de koers te stabiliseren. De huidige koersen op de Amerikaanse markt zijn te hoog, dus er zal een flinke koers correctie komen, waarschijnlijk in Oktober. Of we daarmee ook meteen Argentinie op grote schaal krijgen... wie zal het zeggen.
Zeepbellen komen en gaan
een correctie zal komen, maar niet zo erg als de daling van de Nasdaq (van 5000 naar 1100).
Of denk eens aan de Japanse Nikkei! in 20 jaar tijd 80% gekelderd....
Er is teveel schuld, te weinig inkomen.
Goed stuk:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-3-77-1463.jsp
The reckless financial policies of leading western powers in the last two decades make it likely that the next seismic debt crisis will be in America, not Argentina. It can be avoided, says Ann Pettifor of the Real World Economic Outlook, only by serious efforts to bring regulation and balance to the international economy.
Ofnouja, zo denk ik er dus ook over :p
Vandaag hoorde ik ook een commentaar op een zender dat de aandelenkoersen in de VS opgeblazen zijn. Maar om nou direkt te geloven in een vrijmetselaars complot .... mwah :cheefbek: dat gaat me wat ver.
Ik snap de zin ervan niet zo goed. Ze blazen de eigen economie op als straks de ballon knapt. De consumentenbestedingen lopen dan weer enorm terug, en de angst zal bij velen weer toeslaan.
Of is dit een complot om de VS economisch de nek om te draaien :cool:
Winston Churchill, in his book about that period, The Gathering Storm, described it well:
“The year 1929 reached almost the end of its third quarter under the promise and appearance of increasing prosperity, particularly in the United States. Extraordinary optimism sustained an orgy of speculation. Books were written to prove that economic crisis was a phase, which expanding business organisation and science had at last mastered. “We are apparently finished and done with economic cycles as we have known them” said the President of the New York Stock Exchange in September. But in October a sudden and violent tempest swept over Wall Street…
The whole wealth so swiftly gathered in the paper values of previous years vanished. The prosperity of millions of American homes had grown up a gigantic structure of inflated credit, now suddenly proved phantom. Apart from the nation-wide speculation in shares which even the most famous banks had encouraged by easy loans, a vast system of purchase by instalment of houses, furniture, cars and numberless kinds of household conveniences and indulgences had grown up. All now fell together. But yesterday, there had been the urgent question of parking the motor-cars in which thousands of artisans and craftsmen were beginning to travel to their daily work. Today the grievous pangs of falling wages and rising unemployment afflicted the whole community, engaged till this moment in the most active creation of all kinds of desirable articles…”
Geplaatst door an3sdej
Of is dit een complot om de VS economisch de nek om te draaien :cool:
Als je het echt wil weten, dan moet je hiernaar luisteren:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4681.htm
Paul Krugman is een economische columnist voor de NYTimes. Hij heeft het over het economische plan van de mensen die achter Bush staan. Een programma waarop ze overigens geen campagne hebben gevoerd, want het heeft nogal verstrekkende gevolgen. Hun idee is dat de overheid helemaal niet heeft aan al die sociale verzieningen die zij verzorgen. Maar om dergelijke onpopulaire maatregelen te nemen, moet er dus een crisis worden gecreeerd. De crisis is een economische crisis, waarbij men de situatie zal uitbuiten om deze programmas te schrappen. Het idee is dus een Argentinie op Amerikaanse schaal. Onder het mom van fiscale solvaliteit zal men ingrijpen, maar niet op het militaire budget natuurlijk.