PDA

Bekijk Volledige Versie : Hezbollah blaast Israelische bulldozer op



lennart
19-01-04, 17:23
IDF bulldozer hit by anti-tank missile on northern border

By Uri Ash and Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondents

An IDF bulldozer on Monday was hit by an anti-tank missile while clearing a series of roadside bombs in the western section of the northern border with Lebanon near Moshav Zarit.

The bombs, planted by Hezbollah, were discovered two week ago, but their removal was delayed due to weather conditions.

Hezbollah after the attack released a statement saying "the tractor got a direct hit."

A similar series of bombs was planted in the same area in December last year. Two soldiers were injured in the same area in 2002 after a bomb exploded near their patrol vehicle.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/384676.html

Dit was al even bekend, maar ik lees nu dat de Israelische luchtmacht mogelijk Syrische doelen aan het aanvallen is, als vergelding.

First reports from unofficial sources that Israeli warplanes are conducting air strike against Syrian military targets, after anti-tank missile fired from Lebanon blew up Israeli military D-9 Monday. Israeli casualties reported. IDF vehicle was patrolling area between Moshav Zarit and Yakinton military post.

youssef_007
19-01-04, 18:44
[mod]

theemuts
19-01-04, 22:53
Straks zien we hier weer priksels staan dat Israel weer een vreselijke aanval lanceerde op de hezbollah in Libanon. Dan ook niet klagen hè!

lennart
20-01-04, 15:10
Geplaatst door theemuts
Straks zien we hier weer priksels staan dat Israel weer een vreselijke aanval lanceerde op de hezbollah in Libanon. Dan ook niet klagen hè!

De Hezbollah aanval vond plaats op Libanees grondgebied, want de Israelische bulldozer bevond zich op Libanees grondgebied.

17:02 Galilee division commander: IDF bulldozer was in Lebanese territory when it was hit by Hezbollah missile (Israel Radio)

Al Sawt
20-01-04, 15:16
Geplaatst door Polet

vroeger blies sharon het dichtsbijzijnde dorp incl. bewoners op.
Hij is ook al soft geworden.
Oproep tot een massa-moord!
Dan zit je weer te janken als een bus in Tel Aviv met passagiers en al, wordt opgeblazen.

Victory
20-01-04, 22:46
Geplaatst door Polet
Meer dan ongewapende buldozers kunnen ze niet meer vernielen
Hopelijk doen de joden eens wat terug,
vroeger blies sharon het dichtsbijzijnde dorp incl. bewoners op.
Hij is ook al soft geworden.
Tijd voor actie.

Een jood die oproept tot het vermoorden van de Libanese burgers?

dabboer
21-01-04, 00:54
Crime should not pay





Crime should not pay - that is a maxim of all civilized societies. This is why the law provides punishment for criminals, which should also serve as a deterrent to others who may be contemplating criminal acts. A world in which crime goes unpunished leads directly to the jungle and anarchy. This is equally true for individuals who have committed crimes, as it is for nations that have committed crimes against their neighbors or other nations. Aggression should not be rewarded, it should be punished. It is to be hoped that Saddam Hussein and his admirers have by now learned that lesson.




The accepted rule of international behavior is that a nation committing aggression not be "rewarded" after being defeated, by the return of territories it lost as a result of the war it had started. Violation of this rule is nothing less than an invitation to further aggression.

Nor is it acceptable for the defeated aggressor to make return of the territories it lost a condition for putting an end to the war it started, in other words, demanding "territories for peace." Today's Germany is not demanding the return of territories it lost to Poland in the last world war. Nor is Japan demanding the return of Korea or Manchuria to Japanese control.

Only the case of Israel and its Arab neighbors seems to be different. Egypt attacked Israel four times - in 1948, 1957, 1967 and 1973 - and was defeated four times. Yet it insisted that the Sinai peninsula it lost during these wars of aggression be returned to Egypt. That was Egypt's condition for ending a war Egypt had started. And Israel accepted that condition! No heed was paid to the moral implications of letting the aggressor go unpunished, of rewarding the aggressor. The future implications of setting such a precedent were disregarded.

If Prime Minister Begin hoped that the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty would remain in the history books as "the exception that proves the rule" that an aggressor should receive the well-deserved punishment for his crimes, he was mistaken. The mantra of "territories for peace" and "return to the 1967 borders" was born at Camp David in 1977, and has haunted Israel ever since.

Now along comes Syria, which attacked Israel three times: in 1948, 1967 and again in 1973. It was unsuccessful in 1948, and was defeated in 1967 and 1973, losing control of the Golan Heights. For many years now, Syria has been encouraging the Hezbollah terrorists to attack Israel and has harbored Palestinian terrorists in Damascus.

Nevertheless, following in Egypt's footsteps, Syria demands control of territories it lost in wars of aggression, and demands that Israel "return to the 1967 borders." The doctrine of "territories for peace" has by now embedded itself so deeply in the thoughts of people around the world, including many Israelis, that this outrageous demand seems almost reasonable and natural.

People tend to forget that this nonsensical formula has in the past been used by ****** in 1939, when he declared that he would leave Europe in peace if territories in Poland that Germany lost in World War I were ceded to Germany.

The Syrians make no such demands of the Turks, who in a "land grab" in 1937 annexed the Syrian port of Alexandretta, now Iskanderun, to Turkey. They know only too well what the Turkish response would be. But Israel is known to be a "soft touch." Having given in to Egypt, why should it not also give in to Syria?

In the Golan Heights, just as was the case in the Sinai peninsula, there are no "demographic considerations" to be thrown in our faces. Common sense and the accepted rules of international behavior should determine Israel's response to Bashar Assad's overtures. Sure, we are prepared to negotiate a peace treaty with Syria. But forget about the Golan Heights, and consider yourself lucky if you are not presented with a bill for economic reparations for the damage your aggressive behavior has caused Israel and its citizens over the past 56 years. If you understand that, we shall be happy to sit down and talk. And don't forget, crime does not pay!
















:lole: