lennart
02-05-04, 13:14
Americans Being Held at US Torture Prison in Iraq?
y Mark Rothschild
American citizens held since 2003 at the Abu Ghraib military prison may be among those imprisoned and tortured by the US military in Iraq. The American General in charge of U.S. prisons in Iraq, Brig. Gen Janis Karpinski, said in September 2003 that Americans being held at the Abu Ghraib prison were being interrogated by US military intelligence. The prisoners, said Karpinski, spoke with American accents.
Now that photographs of US torture victims have been displayed on the front pages of numerous newspapers, the fate of the other 12,000 detainees in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison has become a focus of concern.
US Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, who is no longer in Iraq, commanded the 800th Military Police Brigade. It is unclear whether she has been suspended or will face charges, but she has not been relieved of her command. Six members of the Brigade she commanded are facing criminal charges in an investigation that has taken three months and is still not at a stage where the US military will comment on the identities of the personnel being charged.
The torture pictures leaked to the TV program 60 Minutes do not include other pictures still being withheld by the US military that reportedly show bodies of prisoners beaten to death and being attacked by guard dogs.
However, the New Yorker magazine has revealed that it has in its possession a secret U.S. Army report on the horrors taking place at Abu Ghraib prison detailing, in the words of the leaked report, "sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses."
The secret Army report admits to the rape and sodomizing of prisoners and the burning of prisoners with liquid chemicals. Its report was completed a month after the Army’s internal investigation of torture at Abu Ghraib prison began in January, but has remained classified.
Will the full extent of the horrors of Abu Ghraib prison ever be reveled or will the atrocities at Abu Ghraib remain incomplete, known only from a few leaked pictures and documents? This is a question that will probably be answered in the near future.
Amnesty International, an organization that has been investigating "frequent reports of torture" in Coalition prisons, said the torture pictures were, "not an isolated incident," and that there was a "real crisis of leadership in Iraq .…" Amnesty has joined the growing chorus of voices demanding an independent inquiry: "There must be a fully independent, impartial and public investigation into all allegations of torture. Nothing less will suffice."
Brigadier General Ricardo S. Sanchez, who bears ultimate responsibility for US military actions in Iraq, has refused to discuss the issue of personal responsibility — including his own — and his spokesman Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt has implied that the names of those responsible may never be released.
Copyright © 2004 Antiwar.com
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/rothschild.php?articleid=2459
Nu blijkt meteen de overheidscontrole op de Amerikaanse pers. De reden dat dit verhaal naar buiten is gekomen, is omdat de fotos zijn gelekt! Het verhaal was blijkens al maanden bekend bij de Amerikaanse media.
Dit is de link naar de The New Yorker waarin in het artikel naar gerefereerd wordt:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact
A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army’s prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses” at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski’s brigade headquarters.) Taguba’s report listed some of the wrongdoing:
Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape; allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being slammed against the wall in his cell; sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually biting a detainee.
There was stunning evidence to support the allegations, Taguba added—“detailed witness statements and the discovery of extremely graphic photographic evidence.” Photographs and videos taken by the soldiers as the abuses were happening were not included in his report, Taguba said, because of their “extremely sensitive nature.”
y Mark Rothschild
American citizens held since 2003 at the Abu Ghraib military prison may be among those imprisoned and tortured by the US military in Iraq. The American General in charge of U.S. prisons in Iraq, Brig. Gen Janis Karpinski, said in September 2003 that Americans being held at the Abu Ghraib prison were being interrogated by US military intelligence. The prisoners, said Karpinski, spoke with American accents.
Now that photographs of US torture victims have been displayed on the front pages of numerous newspapers, the fate of the other 12,000 detainees in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison has become a focus of concern.
US Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, who is no longer in Iraq, commanded the 800th Military Police Brigade. It is unclear whether she has been suspended or will face charges, but she has not been relieved of her command. Six members of the Brigade she commanded are facing criminal charges in an investigation that has taken three months and is still not at a stage where the US military will comment on the identities of the personnel being charged.
The torture pictures leaked to the TV program 60 Minutes do not include other pictures still being withheld by the US military that reportedly show bodies of prisoners beaten to death and being attacked by guard dogs.
However, the New Yorker magazine has revealed that it has in its possession a secret U.S. Army report on the horrors taking place at Abu Ghraib prison detailing, in the words of the leaked report, "sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses."
The secret Army report admits to the rape and sodomizing of prisoners and the burning of prisoners with liquid chemicals. Its report was completed a month after the Army’s internal investigation of torture at Abu Ghraib prison began in January, but has remained classified.
Will the full extent of the horrors of Abu Ghraib prison ever be reveled or will the atrocities at Abu Ghraib remain incomplete, known only from a few leaked pictures and documents? This is a question that will probably be answered in the near future.
Amnesty International, an organization that has been investigating "frequent reports of torture" in Coalition prisons, said the torture pictures were, "not an isolated incident," and that there was a "real crisis of leadership in Iraq .…" Amnesty has joined the growing chorus of voices demanding an independent inquiry: "There must be a fully independent, impartial and public investigation into all allegations of torture. Nothing less will suffice."
Brigadier General Ricardo S. Sanchez, who bears ultimate responsibility for US military actions in Iraq, has refused to discuss the issue of personal responsibility — including his own — and his spokesman Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt has implied that the names of those responsible may never be released.
Copyright © 2004 Antiwar.com
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/rothschild.php?articleid=2459
Nu blijkt meteen de overheidscontrole op de Amerikaanse pers. De reden dat dit verhaal naar buiten is gekomen, is omdat de fotos zijn gelekt! Het verhaal was blijkens al maanden bekend bij de Amerikaanse media.
Dit is de link naar de The New Yorker waarin in het artikel naar gerefereerd wordt:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact
A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army’s prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses” at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski’s brigade headquarters.) Taguba’s report listed some of the wrongdoing:
Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape; allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being slammed against the wall in his cell; sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually biting a detainee.
There was stunning evidence to support the allegations, Taguba added—“detailed witness statements and the discovery of extremely graphic photographic evidence.” Photographs and videos taken by the soldiers as the abuses were happening were not included in his report, Taguba said, because of their “extremely sensitive nature.”